I/II.
[The short version of the story, revealed by emails the New York Times
obtained, is that the president’s eldest son was offered “some official
documents and information that would incriminate Hillary” and “would be
very useful to your father.”
More to the point, the younger Trump was explicitly told this was “part of
Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” Donald, Jr.’s reply? “I
love it.”
Trump Jr. didn’t just host that meeting at Trump Tower. He also brought
along campaign manager Paul Manafort and top Trump confidante (and
son-in-law) Jared Kushner.
...
The top priority in Congress right now is to move a health bill that would
gut Medicaid and throw at least 22 million Americans off their insurance —
while loosening regulations on insurance companies and cutting taxes on the
wealthiest by over $346 billion.
...
Yet even as scientists warn large parts of the planet could soon become
uninhabitable, the fossil fuel-backed Trump administration has put a
climate denier in charge of the EPA, pulled the U.S. out of Paris, and
signed legislation to let coal companies dump toxic ash in local waterways.]

http://fpif.org/trumps-worst-collusion-isnt-with-russia-
its-with-corporations/

Trump’s Worst Collusion Isn’t With Russia — It’s With Corporations
The billionaires who backed Trump are making out a lot better than Putin.

By Peter Certo, July 12, 2017. Originally published in OtherWords. Share

 donald-trump-der-spiegel-cover
Der Spiegel’s instantly infamous Donald Trump cover.

I’ve always been a little skeptical that there’d be a smoking gun about the
Trump campaign’s alleged collusion with Russia. The latest news about
Donald Trump, Jr., however, is tantalizingly close.

The short version of the story, revealed by emails the New York Times
obtained, is that the president’s eldest son was offered “some official
documents and information that would incriminate Hillary” and “would be
very useful to your father.”

More to the point, the younger Trump was explicitly told this was “part of
Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” Donald, Jr.’s reply? “I
love it.”

Trump Jr. didn’t just host that meeting at Trump Tower. He also brought
along campaign manager Paul Manafort and top Trump confidante (and
son-in-law) Jared Kushner.

We still don’t have evidence they coordinated with Russian efforts to
release Clinton campaign emails, spread “fake news,” or hack state voting
systems. But at the very least, the top members of Trump’s inner circle
turned up to get intelligence they knew was part of a foreign effort to
meddle in the election.

Some in Washington are convinced they’ve heard enough already, with
Virginia senator (and failed VP candidate) Tim Kaine calling the meeting
“treason.”

Perhaps. But it’s worth asking: Who’s done the real harm here? Some argue
it’s not the Russians after all.

“The effects of the crime are undetectable,” the legendary social critic
Noam Chomsky says of the alleged Russian meddling, “unlike the massive
effects of interference by corporate power and private wealth.”

That’s worth dwelling on.

Many leading liberals suspect, now with a little more evidence, that Trump
worked with Russia to win his election. But we’ve long known that huge
corporations and wealthy individuals threw their weight behind the
billionaire.

That gambit’s paying off far more handsomely for them — and more
destructively for the rest of us — than any scheme by Putin.

The evidence is hiding in plain sight.

The top priority in Congress right now is to move a health bill that would
gut Medicaid and throw at least 22 million Americans off their insurance —
while loosening regulations on insurance companies and cutting taxes on the
wealthiest by over $346 billion.

As few as 12 percent of Americans support that bill, but the allegiance of
its supporters isn’t to voters — it’s plainly to the wealthy donors who’d
get those tax cuts.

Meanwhile, majorities of Americans in every single congressional district
support efforts to curb local pollution, limit carbon emissions, and
transition to wind and solar. And majorities in every single state back the
Paris climate agreement.

Yet even as scientists warn large parts of the planet could soon become
uninhabitable, the fossil fuel-backed Trump administration has put a
climate denier in charge of the EPA, pulled the U.S. out of Paris, and
signed legislation to let coal companies dump toxic ash in local waterways.

Meanwhile, as the administration escalates the unpopular Afghan war once
again, Kushner invited billionaire military contractors — including
Blackwater founder Erik Prince — to advise on policy there.

Elsewhere, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and other architects of the housing
crash are advising Trump on financial deregulation, while student debt
profiteers set policy at the Department of Education.

Chomsky complains that this sort of collusion is often “not considered a
crime but the normal workings of democracy.” While Trump has taken it to
new heights, it’s certainly a bipartisan problem.

If Trump’s people did work with Russia to undermine our vote, they should
absolutely be held accountable. But the politicians leading the charge
don’t have a snowball’s chance of redeeming our democracy unless they’re
willing to take on the corporate conspirators much closer to home.

Peter Certo is the editorial manager of the Institute for Policy Studies
and the editor of Foreign Policy In Focus.

II.
[Now, nearly a half-year into his term, Trump needs to demonstrate his
dealmaker cred. He’s just returned from the G20 meeting in Hamburg where
he’s touted his agreement on Syria with Vladimir Putin. It’s not yet clear
whether this ceasefire will stop the fighting in Syria or whether it will
turn out to be another crazy chicken deal with its ridiculous stipulations.
Meanwhile, the United States desperately needs to sit down and talk with
North Korea to avert war in Northeast Asia. It has to help patch up
relations between Qatar and its Persian Gulf neighbors. And it has to find
some way to repair ties with Europe in the wake of Trump’s resolute efforts
to alienate German and French leadership.]

http://fpif.org/can-trump-actually-cut-good-deals-on-diplomacy/

Can Trump Actually Cut (Good) Deals on Diplomacy?
>From North Korea to Russia to the Middle East, there's no shortage of
deal-making needed. But beware the fine print of anything with Trump's
insignia.

By John Feffer, July 12, 2017.

 war-peace-prosperity-diplomacy-obama-administration
 (Flickr: Maxime Bonzi / Flickr)

American beef is now available in China — as a result of a deal that Donald
Trump made with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. In exchange, Chinese chicken is
now available in the United States.

Seems like a fair deal — hats off to Trump.

Oh, except that there are a few important caveats to the quid pro quo. The
chicken can only be cooked. It won’t be labeled as coming from China. And
consumers won’t even know the name of the brand that will market the birds.
So, if you’re worried about eating chicken produced in a country with
notoriously lax food safety regulations and inspections, stay away from
that box of drumsticks in the freezer aisle.

But here’s perhaps the most idiotic part of the deal. The chickens that
China cooks have to be sourced from the United States, Canada, or Chile.
Chickens can’t fly long distances. But these particular chickens are
jetsetters, flying as much as 12,000 miles one way from Chile to China and
then another 7,000 miles from China to the United States.

Sorry, Donald: As deals go, this one’s definitely a zonk, as Monte Hall
would have put it.

Donald Trump based his campaign in part on his ability to make better
deals. He lambasted trade pacts like NAFTA and promised to do better. He
criticized the Iran nuclear agreement and promised to do better. He
challenged the terms of alliance arrangements with Japan and South Korea
and promised to do better.

So far, however, the Trump administration has either left previous deals in
place (NAFTA, Iran, alliances) or simply pulled out unilaterally (Trans
Pacific Partnership, Paris climate deal).

Now, nearly a half-year into his term, Trump needs to demonstrate his
dealmaker cred. He’s just returned from the G20 meeting in Hamburg where
he’s touted his agreement on Syria with Vladimir Putin. It’s not yet clear
whether this ceasefire will stop the fighting in Syria or whether it will
turn out to be another crazy chicken deal with its ridiculous stipulations.

Meanwhile, the United States desperately needs to sit down and talk with
North Korea to avert war in Northeast Asia. It has to help patch up
relations between Qatar and its Persian Gulf neighbors. And it has to find
some way to repair ties with Europe in the wake of Trump’s resolute efforts
to alienate German and French leadership.

This is the bare minimum of negotiating that the administration needs to
do. More ambitious and urgent deals, such as another climate pact or a way
for America to rejoin the existing one, are obviously beyond Trump’s
interest or understanding. At the same time, Trump’s ability to make any
deals in the present is complicated by the deals he or his associates might
have made in the past, particularly with the Russians.

But for the sake of world peace, let’s assume that Trump can do something
positive. It’s been all too easy to see what Trump minus looks like. What
about Trump plus?

Dealing with North Korea

On July 4, North Korea crossed a red line that Trump drew in the
stratosphere. At the beginning of 2017, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un
promised to launch a successful ICBM within the year. Trump tweeted in
return, “It won’t happen.”

Now that North Korea has successfully tested something that approximates an
ICBM — in reality, it would be difficult at this point to imagine the
Hwasong-14 accurately reaching a target in Alaska — Trump must decide how
to proceed.

The Trump administration could continue to ignore North Korea — the very
strategy it has criticized the Obama administration for adopting. It could
go to war, which would be a catastrophe as anyone with even a passing
knowledge of the Korean peninsula could tell you.

Or Trump could go with door number three.

North Korea likes to make deals, and it bargains hard. It tries to extract
the most money or the most ironclad guarantees from both allies and
adversaries. It also sometimes breaks agreements. That, alas, is all too
common in geopolitics.

In 1994, the United States managed to retard North Korea’s nuclear program
by supplying heavy fuel oil and promising to build two light-water reactors
through the Agreed Framework. North Korea secretly pursued a different
(uranium enrichment) path to the bomb, while the United States and its
partners never built those nuclear reactors. Deal off.

Between 1992 and 1994, Israel attempted to pay North Korea about a billion
dollars to stop it from exporting missiles to the Middle East. North Korea
even agreed to allow Israeli inspectors on North Korean soil to verify the
agreement. The United States, however, blocked the effort. Deal off.

In 2007, because of a deal reached at the Six Party Talks, North Korea
began to dismantle its nuclear program in exchange for an easing of
sanctions and the removal of the country from the U.S. terrorism list. But
a year later, disagreements sharpened over inspections, North Korea grew
more recalcitrant, and the incoming Obama administration failed to engage
immediately to sustain momentum. Deal off.

What kind of deal would North Korea consider at this point? Of course I’d
like to see North Korea mothball its nuclear program. But because of its
fear of regime-change efforts, North Korea probably won’t agree to give up
its deterrent capability. The United States could still attempt to freeze
North Korea’s program as is and explore a moratorium on long-range missile
tests (which Pyongyang maintained from 1999 to 2006). The real question is
how much sweetener Washington will have to add to its offer, and what that
sweetener will look like.

Trump has proven that he gets along great with dictators. For once, he
should put this talent to good use.

A Deal with Doha

Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson was a terrible choice for secretary of state for
many reasons — his lack of diplomatic experience, his conflicts of interest
in the energy sector. But if there’s one place in the world where he should
be able to exploit his modest capabilities, it’s the Persian Gulf. In the
wake of the falling out between the tiny sheikhdom of Qatar and its
neighbors Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Tillerson is on his
way to the region to see if he can help sort things out.

It’s not going to be easy. Not only does he have to deal with Riyadh, which
has presented Doha with a long list of frankly unreasonable demands such as
the closure of Al Jazeera, but he also had to do battle with his own
administration. President Trump has indicated his own support for Saudi
Arabia in this conflict even as his underlings in State and the Pentagon
are desperately trying to patch things up. Qatar, after all, hosts Al Udeid
airbase (and 11,000 U.S. and U.S.-led coalition forces) and plays a key
role in the fight against the Islamic State.

So, first task: Get the president to stop tweeting on the issue. It’s not
that difficult. Qatar’s banishment was a full month ago, Trump is easily
distracted, and he’s now busy defending his son from charges of colluding
with the Russians.

Second task: lower expectations. State Department spokesperson Heather
Nauert announced last week that “we believe that this could potentially
drag on for weeks; it could drag on for months; it could possibly even
intensify.”

Third task: connect with the most promising mediator. Kuwait is the go-to
country in this regard. It has remained neutral in the Gulf showdown. It
has also tried to mediate other conflicts in the region, such as the war in
Yemen. It’s the first stop on Tillerson’s itinerary.

Fourth task: apply leverage. The United States can threaten to reduce Saudi
arms sales — which would be an excellent idea anyway — and it can threaten
to move its base away from Qatar. Indeed, Washington holds a lot of trump
cards in this game.

But first, Tillerson has to maneuver Trump out of the game. To clean up the
Gulf mess, I’d choose a former oil exec over a former reality TV star any
day.

Reset with Europe (and Russia?)

A picture in The Washington Post shows Donald Trump sitting alone at a
table during the G20 summit as other participants socialize behind him.
Here is America, in the “solitude of its power,” having “ceased to draw
other nations to itself,” as Jean-Marie Colombani wrote immediately after
9/11in his famous Le Monde article “We Are All Americans.”

Of course, Trump supporters will see a very different photo. Snooty
Europeans! And there is our defiant president, sticking to his guns and
continuing to declare at every turn that America is first.

Indeed, Jeffrey Lord in a CNN commentary, gives Trump 11 out of 10 for his
performance at the G20 (because of the apparently inadvertent reference to
the movie This Is Spinal Tap, I initially took Lord’s piece to be a
satire). “Count on the president’s supporters seeing this as a great win —
a win in which Trump stayed true to his campaign promises to put American
interests above all else,” Lord writes.

Trump has made no real effort to bridge the distance between himself and
European leaders. Indeed, his only other stop in Europe was Poland, where
he could commune with a similarly far-right government that hates
immigrants, the media, and an open society. The Polish government obliged
by bussing in loyalists who could be counted on to cheer a world leader in
which only 23 percent of Poles have any confidence.

>From adulation, Trump then traveled to consternation. Even otherwise
conservative politicians like the UK’s Teresa May have been appalled at
Trump’s maladroit moves at the global level. The assembled leaders of the
G20 probably would have preferred if Ivanka had substituted for her father
throughout the entire proceedings instead of just that one short
seat-warming occasion.

In a direct rebuke to Trump’s dangerous and delusional approach to
environmental issues, the European Union and the rest of the “G19” issued a
final communiqué reaffirming their commitment to the Paris agreement on
climate change. It will probably be the last G20 meeting Trump has to worry
about — the next summits will be in Argentina, Japan, and Saudi Arabia.
Perhaps that’s what he was thinking when he was sitting by himself at the
table. Or perhaps he was daydreaming about firing all the other G20 leaders.

The focus of media coverage, meanwhile, was the sideline meeting between
Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Controversy continues to swirl
over what the two might have said, or promised, concerning the charges of
Russian interference in the U.S. election. But let’s take a closer look at
the deal-making.

Putin and Trump capped several months of behind-the-scenes negotiations
when they announced a ceasefire in Syria as the UN starts up its seventh
round of indirect peace talks. Sure, there are plenty of reasons why this
ceasefire is flawed. Every previous attempt at stopping the bloodshed has
failed. This one covers only one part of the country. Iran did not
participate in the deal. Russian police are slated to monitor the
ceasefire, but Israel has already said that it doesn’t want Russians across
its borders in Syria. It’s a win for Syria’s murderous leader, Bashar
al-Assad.

But peace has to start somewhere. So, let’s provide some muted applause for
the deal. Maybe it will represent a turning point for Syria. Maybe it will
represent a turning point for Trump’s foreign policy, and Tillerson can use
the political capital in both Doha and Pyongyang.

But beware of the fine print on any deal with Trump’s insignia on it. For a
businessman who routinely swindled his contractors and filed bankruptcy to
escape from his monumental mistakes, the “art of the deal” is all about
looking out for number one.

And let’s be clear, number one is not America. It’s Trump himself.

John Feffer is the director of Foreign Policy In Focus and the author of
the dystopian novel Splinterlands.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to