Here is the exclusive link to the text of the order: <https://barandbench.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Aadhaar-order-watermark.pdf>. In case any one is interested without getting one's mailbox loaded with an attachment.
Sukla On 15/12/2017, Sukla Sen <[email protected]> wrote: > [This judgement was, in a way, prefigured in the manner the CJAR petition, > as regards judicial accountability, had been dealt with (ref.: < > http://www.news18.com/news/india/chief-justice-of-india-takes-away-judges-bribery-case-from-justice-chelameswars-bench-1573877.html>) > and subsequently dismissed with an exemplary fine of Rs. 25 lakh slapped on > the petitioner (ref.: < > http://www.news18.com/news/india/chief-justice-of-india-takes-away-judges-bribery-case-from-justice-chelameswars-bench-1573877.html >>.) > Also ref.: <https://www.change.org/p/citizens-act-now-to-save-the-judiciary >>.] > > http://www.livelaw.in/breaking-sc-extends-deadline-mandatory-linkage-aadhaar-schemes-services-march-31/ > > Breaking: SC Extends Deadline for Mandatory Linkage Of Aadhaar With All > Schemes And Services To March 31 [Read Order] > > BY: MEHAL JAIN DECEMBER 15, 2017 10:57 AM > > The five-judges Constitution bench of the Supreme Court on Friday extended > the deadline for mandatory linkage of Aadhaar number with all services and > schemes including bank accounts and mobile numbers, to March 31, 2018. > > In respect of bank accounts , the deadline had been extended to March 31, > 2018, with leniency in so far as the holders of new bank accounts are > concerned, mere application for Aadhaar shall suffice and the application > number may be submitted. > > The last date for mandatory Aadhaar based E-KYC for mobile services has > been extended to March 31, 2018 from the earlier date of February 6, 2018, > stipulated under order dated February 6 of the Supreme Court in Lok Niti > Foundation v. UOI. > > Further, the deadline for all schemes of the ministries and departments of > the Union government as extended to March 31, 2018 shall also be applicable > to all state governments. Finally, the judgement in Binoy Viswam v. UOI > shall continue to prevail in so far as the requirement of Aadhaar for PAN > under section 139 AA of the Income Tax Act of 1961 is concerned. > > Snipped > -- > Peace Is Doable > -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
