[The judgement is of a piece with quite a few other recent ones, including
the interim one on the Aadhaar.

<<The Congress later said that though the poll panel had acknowledged the
need to verify VVPAT with votes cast using voting machines, it checks the
paper trail in only one booth in a constituency. This, the party said,
makes the rule ineffective.
There are close to 300-400 booths in each constituency, and checking just
one does not make sense, Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said.
“We we are not against EVMs per se but we want VVPAT with all machines, the
sampling of voting on EVMs with the VVPAT trail be done in at least 10%-15%
cases if not 25%.”>>

The only way to go ahead is to develop a vigorous public campaign.]

https://scroll.in/latest/861628/gujarat-elections-sc-dismisses-congress-plea-to-verify-vvpat-with-electronic-voting-machine-votes

Gujarat elections: SC dismisses Congress’ plea to verify VVPAT with
electronic voting machine votes
The court said that it cannot interfere in the electoral process only to
allay the apprehensions of one party.

by  Scroll Staff
Published Yesterday · 04:41 pm Updated Yesterday · 08:22 pm.

Gujarat elections: SC dismisses Congress’ plea to verify VVPAT with
electronic voting machine votes

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected the Congress’ plea urging it to direct
the Election Commission to verify at least 25% of the Voter Verifiable
Paper Audit Trail, or VVPAT, with votes cast using the electronic voting
machines in the Gujarat Assembly elections.

The Congress later said that though the poll panel had acknowledged the
need to verify VVPAT with votes cast using voting machines, it checks the
paper trail in only one booth in a constituency. This, the party said,
makes the rule ineffective.

There are close to 300-400 booths in each constituency, and checking just
one does not make sense, Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said.
“We we are not against EVMs per se but we want VVPAT with all machines, the
sampling of voting on EVMs with the VVPAT trail be done in at least 10%-15%
cases if not 25%.”

@DrAMSinghvi briefs the press on the petition by @INCGujarat to the SC
requesting cross verification of VVPAT slips and EVMs.
https://t.co/8Dz8bHKuMZ

— Congress (@INCIndia) December 15, 2017
The top court said that it found no merit in the party’s plea, and that it
cannot override the Election Commission’s complete discretion to conduct
elections, The Times of India reported. The Supreme Court bench told
Singhvi and senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal, who appeared for the party,
that the electoral process is of utmost importance and the court cannot
interfere in order to allay the apprehensions of just one party.

The court, however, told the counsel that the Congress can approach it
again with a writ petition seeking electoral reforms. Singhvi said that the
party would not only file a detailed petition as the court had instructed,
but would also spearhead the discussion and debate on the matter.

Supreme Court said that it finds no merit in Congress' plea, adds that
Gujarat Congress can approach SC through filing a writ petition for
electoral reforms.

— ANI (@ANI) December 15, 2017
Gujarat became the second state after Goa to use the VVPAT system that
allows the voting machine to dispense a paper to the voters, allowing them
to verify if their vote has been cast correctly. Both the first and second
phase of Gujarat Assembly election polling was, however, marred by reports
of malfunctioning electronic voting machines.

A number of exit polls on Thursday predicted a comfortable win for the
Bharatiya Janata Party in the Assembly elections in both Gujarat and
Himachal Pradesh.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to