[<<Under the party constitution, if the total number of members of these
units is more than one-third of the membership of total party members, they
can move an alternate draft resolution to be taken up at the party
congress. West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Odisha, Maharashtra,
Gujarat and Jammu and Kashmir are among the states which voted in favour of
Mr Yechury’s resolution at the central committee.

Interestingly, though Mr Yechury or his so called Bengal faction was hugely
outnumbered by Mr Karat’s Kerala faction at the central committee as well
as the politburo earlier, at the party congress the two sides would have
almost equal representation. The party congress has roughly 600 members.
Thus it would be easier for Mr Yechury to move any amendment he desires
there. However, traditionally, the party congress has never accepted any
amendment which goes against the sense of the draft resolution adopted by
the central committee.>>

So, this may not be the final end.
Some real drama may be awaiting us.
Only, maybe.]

http://www.asianage.com/india/politics/220118/cpm-rejects-yechury-plan-for-congress-pact.html

CPM rejects Yechury plan for Congress pact

THE ASIAN AGE. |
SREEPARNA CHAKRABARTY
Published : Jan 22, 2018, 12:52 am IST Updated : Jan 22, 2018, 12:52 am IST

Fireworks likely at party meet in April, Bengal camp will push draft again.

Sitaram Yechury  (Photo: PTI)

New Delhi: The CPI(M) central committee, at a meeting in Kolkata, on Sunday
rejected a resolution moved by its general secretary Sitaram Yechury and
backed by its influential Bengal unit, for a political understanding with
the Congress. With this, the battle has now shifted to the party congress
to be held in Hyderabad in April, where an alternative resolution may be
moved by at least 12 state units reiterating the need for a broader
political understanding with the Congress in order to defeat the BJP in
2019.

The “tyranny of the majority”, which the Left party has accused the BJP of
practising in the Lok Sabha on many occasions, came back to haunt the
CPI(M) as its central committee defeated the resolution moved by the Bengal
faction led by Mr Yechury by a margin of 55-31, virtually closing the door
for any political understanding with the Congress ahead of the 2019 general
election. The central committee instead adopted the draft put forward by Mr
Yechury’s arch-rival, former general secretary Prakash Karat.

However, highly-placed sources said at least 12 state units are prepared to
move an alternative draft at the 22nd party congress to be held in
Hyderabad in April.

Under the party constitution, if the total number of members of these units
is more than one-third of the membership of total party members, they can
move an alternate draft resolution to be taken up at the party congress.
West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Odisha, Maharashtra, Gujarat and
Jammu and Kashmir are among the states which voted in favour of Mr
Yechury’s resolution at the central committee.

Interestingly, though Mr Yechury or his so called Bengal faction was hugely
outnumbered by Mr Karat’s Kerala faction at the central committee as well
as the politburo earlier, at the party congress the two sides would have
almost equal representation. The party congress has roughly 600 members.
Thus it would be easier for Mr Yechury to move any amendment he desires
there. However, traditionally, the party congress has never accepted any
amendment which goes against the sense of the draft resolution adopted by
the central committee.

However, there were sure to be fireworks at the party congress over this.
An adamant Mr Yechury had even threatened to quit at the politburo and
central committee meetings if his draft was also not taken up for
consideration along with Mr Karat’s draft.

When questioned on this at a press conferen-ce on Sunday, he said: “I am
here as the party has asked me to continue as the general secretary.”
Though disagreements are the norm in other parties, it is rare in the
CPI(M). Once the party adopts a “political-tactical” line, everyone is
supposed to stick to it. But in reality, the CPI(M) now has two party
lines. The last time that happened — in the undivided Communist Party in
1964 — it had split.

In the two months from now till the party congress, the draft will be put
up for consultation. During this time, all state committees, intellectuals
and other stakeholders can put forward their views and suggest amendments.

Sources said the central committee meeting held four rounds of voting over
the draft. The first saw 51-25 voting, in the second round it was 30-52, in
the third it was 35-52 while the final round saw 31-55 voting. There were a
total of 75 amendments moved in the final round.

“The draft political resolution adopted af-ter incorporating some
amendments states that there should be no electoral alliance or
understanding with the Congress,” Mr Yechury told reporters in Kolkata
after the central committee meeting was over.

Though the central committee and the politburo are dominated by the Kerala
faction, a state where the CPI(M) is in power, it is the other state
committees, led by West Bengal, which are keen on an alliance with the
Congress as the party cadre feel that without it the party will lose all
its electoral relevance.

Unfortunately, such an alliance in the West Bengal Assembly elections in
2016 had not worked for the CPI(M), with the party coming third, even after
the Congress. After this, calls by the Karat camp for an ideologically pure
stand gained mo-mentum.

Mr Yechury was also denied a third term in the RS which he could have won
with Congre-ss support. He is also unlikely to get another term as party
general secretary.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to