[Games are on, as it looks. <<The Collegium resolution (on the website) stated that while it's unanimous in the view that Justice KM Joseph's name should be reiterated for elevation to the top court but 'in-principle', the formal reiteration to the Centre has not happened since there could not be an agreement on other names proposed for elevation to Supreme Court. The decision has been deferred till May 16, and Joseph's name will be sent with others. KM Joseph is the Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court.>>]
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/decision-deferred-again-sc-collegium-fails-to-formally-reiterate-km-joseph-for-elevation-1231588-2018-05-11 Decision deferred again: SC Collegium fails to formally reiterate KM Joseph for elevation Anusha Soni New Delhi May 11, 2018 UPDATED 23:30 IST HIGHLIGHTS At last Collegium meeting, decision deferred for unstated reasons Now, the decision has been deferred till May 16 KM Joseph is the Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court KM Joseph Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice KM Joseph. (Photo: PTI) The Supreme Court Collegium, a group composed of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and four other senior judges, once again failed to formally reiterate the name of Justice K.M Joseph for elevation to the top court. Even at the last Collegium meeting, held on May 2, the decision was deferred for unstated reasons. The Collegium resolution (on the website) stated that while it's unanimous in the view that Justice KM Joseph's name should be reiterated for elevation to the top court but 'in-principle', the formal reiteration to the Centre has not happened since there could not be an agreement on other names proposed for elevation to Supreme Court. READ | Collegium must reiterate KM Joseph's name for elevation, Justice Chelameswar tells CJI Misra The decision has been deferred till May 16, and Joseph's name will be sent with others. KM Joseph is the Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court. At the Collegium's last meeting, there was no consensus on recommending Joseph's elevation, after the government returned the file. According to sources, while the chief justice felt other names should also be discussed before reasserting Joseph's, the other judges' firm view was that instances of 'cherry picking' by the government shouldn't be tolerated. Jasti Chelameshwar, second only to the chief justice in terms of seniority, wrote to him recently to demand that Joseph's name be re-asserted as soon as possible. WATCH | Supreme Court is sitting on a volcano: Indira Jaising at India Today Conclave -- Peace Is Doable -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
