Two judgements. One by four, led by the CJI. A (strongly) dissenting one by Justice Chandrachud.
The majority judgement, that really matters: 《*_Aadhaar Verdict so far_*: Here is list of where things stand: ~ For obtaining bank accounts – Not Required ~ For mobile numbers – Not Required ~ School admissions – Not Required ~ Examinations [NEET, CBSE etc] – Not Required ~ Aadhaar-PAN linkage – Required ~ Section 33(2) [disclosure of Aadhaar information to an officer not below the rank of Joint Secretary to the Government of India] – Struck Down ~ Section 33(1) [disclosure of information on the basis of a court order] – Read Down. The Court has held that the individual should be given opportunity of hearing ~ Section 57 [use of Aadhaar number for establishing the identity of an individual for any purpose, whether by the State or any body corporate or person] – Struck Down ~ Section 47 [no court shall take cognizance of an offence under the Act except on a complaint made by UIDAI] – Modified. Should include a provision for an individual to file a complaint *Read more at* https://barandbench.com/aadhaar-verdict-what-supreme-court-upheld-struck-down/ 》 Sukla -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
