[《The court's decision disappointed many Hindu groups, which had hoped for
a day-to-day hearing to begin. Immediately, there was a chorus of demands
from within the BJP and various Sangh Parivar outfits that the Centre bring
an Ordinance or legislation in the Winter session of Parliament for the
early construction of a Ram temple (without waiting for the court's
verdict) ahead of next year's general elections.》]

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-supreme-court-rejects-hindu-mahasabha-plea-1386607-2018-11-12?fbclid=IwAR1fA66Dr4M5honJCPfMEbI0BpA_5wZWrXzKAtR-0KPYR0bI_MeK3E_Y3Ng

Ayodhya title suit: Supreme Court rejects Hindu Mahasabha plea for early
hearing
On October 29, the Supreme Court said an “appropriate bench” would decide
in January when to hear the politically sensitive case.

IndiaToday.in
New Delhi

November 12, 2018UPDATED: November 12, 2018 12:38 IST

Security personnel at the disputed site in Ayodhya on December 8, 1992, two
days after the demolition of the Babri Masjid. (Photo: India Today/Prashant
Panjiar)

HIGHLIGHTS
Babri Masjid stood on disputed site, was razed in 1992
Allahabad High Court divided land into 3 parts
Supreme Court hearing pleas challenging the High Court's verdict
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Hindu Mahasabha's plea seeking an
early hearing of the Ayodhya title suit.

The case pertains to pleas challenging an Allahabad High Court judgment
that divided disputed land in the Uttar Pradesh city, believed by millions
of Hindus to be Lord Ram's birthplace, into three parts.

On October 29, the Supreme Court said an appropriate bench would decide in
January when to hear the politically sensitive case.

MAGAZINE | The Ayodhya almanac

The court's decision disappointed many Hindu groups, which had hoped for a
day-to-day hearing to begin. Immediately, there was a chorus of demands
from within the BJP and various Sangh Parivar outfits that the Centre bring
an Ordinance or legislation in the Winter session of Parliament for the
early construction of a Ram temple (without waiting for the court's
verdict) ahead of next year's general elections.

The Congress and Muslim groups wanted all stakeholders to wait for the
verdict.


Members from various Hindu hardline groups shouting slogans during a
demonstration held in Chandigarh to mark the 25th anniversary of the Babri
Masjid's demolition, in December last year. (Photo: Reuters)
In 1992, the Babri Masjid, which stood on the disputed land in Ayodhya, was
razed by kar sevaks. In 2010, the Allahabad High Court divided the land
between the Ram Lalla, the Nirmohi Akhada and the Sunni Waqf Board.

On November 1 this year, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh ideologue Rakesh
Sinha, who is a BJP MP, suggested he would soon introduce a private
member's bill in Parliament seeking the construction of a Ram temple.

Inputs from Sanjay Sharma and PTI


-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to