[Each one must act like a puppet and must mouth only what the puppeteer
says!

This is the one, who as the Attorney General, had claimed before the
Supreme Court that the Aadhaar data was safe as because it it's stored in a
building surrounded by 13' high and 5' thick wall!

Now, his injunction is that all the judges must speak the same voice!
This one is, of course, no laughing matter.
Has profoundly dangerous implications.

<<"If a bench of the Supreme Court speak in two different voices, one says
permit and other says no, then this is dangerous," he said ...>>]

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/attorney-general-says-two-different-voices-in-supreme-court-are-dangerous-1960113?fbclid=IwAR1uVAMo440yuTznXS1qxwUbTAJ3UI4DbLKg7rlOGhcE80mmHRap_sbT_AA

2 Different Voices In Supreme Court Are Dangerous: Attorney General

KK Venugopal said from the very beginning, there has been conflict a
between Parliament and the executive on one hand, and judiciary on the
other, and it was not proper for the court to believe that unless they
interfere, the country is doomed.

All India | Press Trust of India | Updated: December 10, 2018 00:01 IST

2 Different Voices In Supreme Court Are Dangerous: Attorney General
New concept of constitutional morality may now be used for testing laws, KK
Venugopal


NEW DELHI:

HIGHLIGHTS
Constitutional morality may be used for testing laws, said KK Venugopal
He said he was hoping that constitutional morality dies
He was referring to the Sabarimala judgment by the Supreme Court

Attorney General K K Venugopal on Saturday expressed concern over the
Supreme Court relying on the concept of constitutional morality after it
gave a 4:1 verdict in the Sabarimala case and said it might be used now for
the purpose of testing laws.
On September 28, a five-judge Constitution bench, headed by the then Chief
Justice Dipak Misra, in a 4:1 verdict, had paved the way for entry of women
of all ages into Sabarimala temple in Kerala, saying the ban amounted to
gender discrimination.

While speaking at the Second J Dadachanji memorial debate, Mr Venugopal
hailed as "enlightened" the dissenting judgment given by top court judge
Justice Indu Malhotra in the Sabarimala case.

"I am saying all this because of a fear that this new concept of
constitutional morality may now be used for the purpose of testing laws,"
he said.

"In the Sabarimala case, the dissenting judge, Justice Indu Malhotra,
relied upon constitutional morality and said that constitutional morality
will require that every single individual would have the right to his own
faith and nobody can interfere with it, the courts cannot interfere with
what is the matter of faith," Mr Venugopal said.

Referring to the majority judgement by four judges in the Sabarimala case,
he said they had elaborately stressed on constitutional morality and said
that constitutional morality was "equality and equality before the law
means you cannot discriminate against a class of women".

"If a bench of the Supreme Court speak in two different voices, one says
permit and other says no, then this is dangerous," he said, adding, that
"no one knows where this fight will go and therefore, I am hoping that
constitutional morality will die".

Mr Venugopal said from the very beginning, there has been conflict a
between Parliament and the executive on one hand, and judiciary on the
other, and it was not proper for the court to believe that unless they
interfere, the country is doomed.

"The Supreme Court has not been given the powers of legislation. If the
Supreme Court tries to assert legislative powers, it would not be supremacy
of the constitution, but supremacy of the Supreme Court of India which is
wholly impermissible," said Mr Venugopal.

He also referred to Article 142 of the Constitution, which deals with
enforcement of decrees and orders of the top court.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to