[Vasundhara Raje, the then Chief Minister of Rajasthan, and Sushma Swaraj,
the External Affairs Minister, had personally lobbied with the UK
administration to obtain necessary travel permissions for Lalit Modi, a
fugitive from Indian law.
(Ref.: <
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/after-sushma-swaraj-vasundhara-raje-named-in-lalit-modi-visa-row/story-oTd2sYz8qKSgmKacnYXbQL.html
>.)

It's not too difficult to make out how Jaitley would like the "bull's-eye"
to be defined.
And whom all he'd like to be issued a free-pass.

《Although Jaitley has not mentioned any specific agency, the case is being
probed by the CBI, which falls under a ministry that reports to the Prime
Minister.
Yet, Jaitley has chosen to “advise” the CBI at a time the agency is
struggling to cope with a credibility crisis and charges of political
meddling.
“My advice to our investigators — Follow the advice of Arjun in the
Mahabharat — ***Just concentrate on the bulls eye*** [emphasis added],”
Jaitley said in the post. CBI officials expressed shock in private.
On Thursday, the CBI had not only booked former ICICI Bank chief Chanda
Kochhar and her husband but also tossed a live grenade into the world of
banking by recommending investigations against several high priests of
finance.》]

https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/is-cbi-probe-into-icici-bank-becoming-investigative-adventurism-wonders-arun-jaitley-minister-without-portfolio/cid/1682830?fbclid=IwAR2C3XjtyhauPgUCRGUdiNrEokoXd2kbHyF3b1iE4IyFourNFndh6JFzBgA#.XEv9Nx6ggnk.facebook

Investigative adventurism? Which case, Mr Jaitley?
>From New York, ‘advice’ on ICICI Bank probe

By TT Bureau in New Delhi

Published 26.01.19, 3:12 AMUpdated 26.01.19, 3:12 AM
2 mins read

Arun Jaitley
The Telegraph file picture

On a day the CBI raided Congress leader Bhupinder Hooda and sought the
custody of P. Chidambaram, Arun Jaitley referred to “investigative
adventurism” and wondered “is a journey to nowhere (or everywhere) being
undertaken?”

The convalescing minister without portfolio, who was finance minister till
Wednesday, was not referring to the cases linked to the Congress but the
ICICI Bank loan case being probed by the CBI.

Jaitley, representing a government that has been trying hard to distance
itself from big business and project a pro-poor visage, swam against the
political tide and asked in a Facebook post from New York: “If we include
the entire who’s who of the Banking Industry — with or without evidence —
what cause are we serving or actually hurting?”

Although Jaitley has not mentioned any specific agency, the case is being
probed by the CBI, which falls under a ministry that reports to the Prime
Minister.

Yet, Jaitley has chosen to “advise” the CBI at a time the agency is
struggling to cope with a credibility crisis and charges of political
meddling.

“My advice to our investigators — Follow the advice of Arjun in the
Mahabharat — Just concentrate on the bulls eye,” Jaitley said in the post.
CBI officials expressed shock in private.

On Thursday, the CBI had not only booked former ICICI Bank chief Chanda
Kochhar and her husband but also tossed a live grenade into the world of
banking by recommending investigations against several high priests of
finance.

The recommendation to probe the heavyweights, including K.V. Kamath and the
bosses of Goldman Sachs India and Standard Chartered India, had sent
shockwaves through corporate India, especially at a time business-baiting
has become a sport in the election season.

Kamath, a veteran banker, had been nominated by the Union government to
head the New Development Bank (formerly BRICS Development Bank).

The head honchos were part of a committee that had cleared a loan for the
Videocon group, in exchange for which Chanda’s husband was allegedly
rewarded by the beneficiary in the form of investments in his company.

Jaitley cited several reasons why “investigative adventurism” should be
avoided –-- which is what most of the Opposition has also been saying as
its supporters are targeted. But the minister confined himself to the
“potential targets” in the bank case.

Jaitley posted: “Sitting thousands of kilometers away, when I read the list
of potential targets in the ICICI case, the thought that crossed my mind
was again the same – Instead of focusing primarily on the target, is a
journey to nowhere (or everywhere) being undertaken?”

Jaitley had begun the post by referring to “investigative adventurism”.

“There is a fundamental difference between investigative adventurism and
professional investigation,” he wrote.

“Investigative adventurism involves casting the net too wide including
people with no mens rea -- intention to commit a crime or knowledge of
wrongdoing (addition by this newspaper) --- or even having a common
intention to commit an offence, relying on presumptions and surmises with
no legally admissible evidence.

“Adventurism leads to media leaks, ruins reputations and eventually invites
strictures and not convictions. In the process, the targets are ruined
because of harassment, loss of reputation and financial costs. It costs
people their career.

“Professional investigation targets the real accused on the basis of actual
and admissible evidences. It rules out fanciful presumptions. There is no
personal malice or corruption. It targets the guilty and protects the
innocent. It secures convictions and furthers public interest.

“One of the reasons why our conviction rates are poor is that adventurism
and megalomania overtakes our investigators and professionalism takes a
back seat.”

Although CBI officers declined any official comment, one of them said on
the condition of anonymity: “It is shocking to say the least. The minister
is now sounding like a compulsive contrarian.”

Last week, Jaitley had hit out at political rivals and slammed “compulsive
contrarians” who have “no qualms about manufacturing falsehood”, citing the
case of judge Loya, the Rafale deal and the CBI crisis.

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to