Statement of the Radical Socialist on the Citizen Amendment Act (CAA), the
Proposed National Register of Citizens (NRC) an the Ongoing Protests
Against Them



The Radical Socialist Group (RS) salutes the students up and down the
country that have been the real spark that has ignited this popular
agitation against the iniquitous CAA and the proposed all-India NRC that is
already being prepared. This agitation really took off when peaceful
protestors against these two measures and about other intra-university
concerns in Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) University and Aligarh Muslim
University (AMU) were singled out for particularly harsh physical
punishment and brutality by the police. Their use of lathis, gas grenades,
tear gas, even live ammunition within as well as outside the university
campuses caused a couple of hundred or more injuries among students and
civilians. The brutality of this assault on these students is not an
accident since they are both Muslim minority educational institutions
having a higher than average proportion of Muslims students even as the
majority of students, faculty and employees are not. Clearly, the Central
government in Delhi and the Yogi Adityanath government in UP deliberately
gave a long rope to the police for they would not otherwise have dared to
behave in this way.

In localities where a significant proportion of Muslims live, there is
growing recognition that these measures are seeking to punish Muslims in
particular; hence other marches and demonstrations which have led to
confrontations with the police. UP in fact has been turned into a war zone
with the police firing and killing with intent against residents in
predominantly Muslim localities. For the first time since Emergency Section
144 preventing public assembly of more than five people has been imposed on
the whole state – a sign of the viciousness and ruthlessness of this
Hindutva-wadi government! Nevertheless huge assemblies have still taken
place in Bareilly and Kanpur deserving our admiration for the courage and
persistence of the participants, Muslims and Non-Muslims alike even as the
former have had to bear the brunt of these attacks.

To be sure there are other protestors. A huge number of non-Muslim students
were involved in these demonstrations and protests throughout the country
as also a wide cross-section of ordinary citizens from various walks of
life. The push given by the students has been caught up by masses all over
India. By Christmas, 2019, about 12 to 13 million people have marched
across India. In Assam and some states in the northeast, the motivations of
most protestors reflected more specific sentiments of regional rather than
religious exclusion, i.e., concerns about non-Assamese and non-indigenous
peoples whether from other parts of India (many) or from Bangladesh (much
fewer) changing local demographic patterns. Such sentiments are to be seen
in the context of violation in Assam Accord and make it very difficult for
the BJP, the Sangh Parivar and their in-house elite trumpeters to champion
their cause. Of course many parties opposed for their own reasons to the
BJP have jumped into the fray. But because they are not the initiators nor
the dominant presence in these protests, the public credibility of this
movement has been higher and public support and sympathy that much greater.

The struggle has led to fissures opening up in the bloc the BJP sought to
cement. At the same time, it has shown why inadequate attention to specific
oppressions can lead to sections of the oppressed being co-opted by the
Sangh. Thus, on one hand, the NRC in Assam having already declared over
2000 transgenders as non-citizens, members of the transgender community were
seen in some places as significant visible protestors. On the other hand,
however, a much larger community, the Matuas of (mainly) West Bengal, who
are mostly Namasudras (Dalits) forced out from East Pakistan/Bangladesh,
have felt aggrieved. Many of them have been deprived of citizenship due to
the 2003 amendment. As a result, they are a group who are being targeted by
the BJP through the CAA. While the left, including RS and its predecessors,
have supported the right of this community, the fact that the BJP is in
power, as well as its ability to fan hatred of the Muslims among sections
of the Dalits, have meant that they are turning to the Sangh and its
politics. Without diluting our hostility to the CAA, we stress that there
is a need to ensure the restoration of the rights of this community, which
were clipped in 2003.

There are three main reasons why students have come out in this way. First,
to show solidarity with fellow students and their rights within and outside
university campuses to exercise freedom of speech, assembly and protest
without having to face such brutal police assaults resulting in hundreds
injured and even a few deaths. Second, what is very welcome is the growing
recognition that this attack on secularism automatically means an assault
on the principles and practices of democracy itself. Third, this government
since 2014 has systematically sought to severely weaken the independence of
thought and behaviour of students and teachers by pursuing policies of (i)
privatization hurting the access of poor and not-so-poor students,
especially but not only among the lower castes, to cheap and decent
education at the tertiary level; (ii) communalization of syllabi and in
faculty selection as well as in the appointments of of VCs and senior
administrative staff; (iii) centralization to weaken the control and
influence of non-BJP ruled state governments since most educational
institutions come under their authority.

So much has already been written (and very widely) about the contradictions
and iniquities of the CAA and of what an all-India NRC would do. There is
little point therefore in repeating what has been said. This RS statement
will speak about what needs to be said but has hardly been highlighted.
Time and again, left and progressive forces have underestimated if not the
determination, then the degree of longer term planning behind some of the
key policy manoeuvres of this Hindutva government.

Take the CAB, now an Act. It was brought into the public discourse in 2016
and introduced into Parliament only after 2019 when the BJP was confident
of it passing both houses. But in 2018 the RBI passes a notification
allowing non-Muslim minorities from exactly the same three countries of
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh to buy immovable property in India
provided they had a long term visa. Furthermore, they could open
non-resident bank accounts to stash their earnings in India. To call this
geographical parallel a coincidence would stretch even the most credulous
of imaginations.

The CAA in itself does not directly affect Indian Muslim citizens but of
course we know it is the necessary prelude to the NRC which is aimed at
domestically resident Muslims not just in Assam but throughout the country
once the NRC goes national. Insofar as current events have pushed the SAD
and BJD which supported the CAA to oppose the NRC extension, expect the BJP
to now use stick and carrot to bring them in line. But the CAA on its own
sends a very important message---a strong one to Hindus in the three named
countries; a significant message also to Hindus elsewhere in South Asia and
the world. It is the first time legislative flesh has been given to a
political-symbolic statement that has regularly been repeated from the time
of Savarkar and Golwalkar to Mohan Bhagwat today, namely that India is the
natural home of Hindus and thus vice versa, Hindus are the ‘true’ people of
India. Hindus in the three neighbouring Muslim majority states are being
given an invitation to consider coming in thereby increasing the Hindu
population. Other Hindus from Sri Lanka and elsewhere can also become
naturalised Indian citizens, albeit for the time being, more slowly. This
is the initial step in a longer term process of partially emulating
Israel’s ‘right of return’ for Jews, here for Hindus. And like Israel,
Hindutva aims to forge a global loyalty among a diaspora of Indians of
Hindu descent and ‘blood’ only. That the CAA and NRC can also promote
conversions by Muslims and others to Hinduism has not escaped the minds of
Sangh leaders.

As for the NRC, it has not one but two strategic aims. First, to terrorise
and inferiorise Muslims by placing as many as possible in various detention
camps and to more generally deprive them and others caught in the net such
as non-Muslim political ‘troublemakers’ and many among the poor and lower
castes (who can be discarded) of numerous rights including to vote, own
land, having job permanency or creating other restrictions to make
livelihood insecure and inadequate. In 1935 Hitler took away citizenship
from Jews, Gypsies and others not ‘German by Aryan descent’. Over the next
few years, more laws were put in place to restrict movement, job
opportunities, marriages with Germans, and so on till finally, in war-time,
these stateless non-citizen Jews were put in concentration camps. Here, the
journey time between Muslims and others made non-citizens, and placement in
detention camps, will be much quicker.

The second goal encompasses the whole population. Census taking involves
enumeration of self-declared responses to a set of questions. The proposed
NRC will require much more detailed responses to many more intrusive
questions from all households and their members so as to build up the most
comprehensive collection of personal data. In effect this is crucial to
creating a new and very powerful surveillance state that can carry out
micro-level monitoring to better deal with actual and potential opponents
in civil society. If this Orwellian vision seems far-fetched one needs only
look at what has already been going on since 2014. Look at the efforts to
link Aadhar to bank accounts, mobiles and to as much as possible of
everyday activity. This has partially been restrained by the courts when it
made personal privacy a fundamental right. But the effort to undermine this
by creating exceptions in the name of national security and similarly
claimed urgencies is an ongoing one.  In the next Parliament session, a
personal Data Protection Bill will be brought in which has been reworked to
maximise exceptions thereby allowing various wings of the government to spy
on targeted individuals and groups. This Bill has been sent to a
parliamentary committee where the chair and majority membership are either
BJP MPs or sympathisers from allied parties, so that the final product will
be what this government wants. Given that the NDA holds a majority it will
become an Act. As it is, the court of last appeal against violations of
privacy will be the Data Protection Authority whose members will not be
independent of the government but appointed by it.

Look too at the current efforts to erode RTI’s functioning. Here the court
of final appeal is supposed to be the Information Commissioners at the
level of states and the Centre. They are supposed to help applicants when
government departments unjustifiably delay their responses or simply evade
matters altogether or give information not asked for or justify evasions on
grounds not permitted by the terms of the RTI Act. Not only has the
government deliberately not filled in many vacancies among these
Commissioners but it has now eroded their independence by giving itself the
power to decide the salaries and tenures of the Commissioners.

Finally, look at the huge hate-and-fake messages manufactured on social
media by the Sangh Parivar’s army of trolls. And if this social media can
also bypass the largely suborned print and electronic media to also serve
the mobilising interests and information spreading of progressive forces,
as has been the case in the help provided in mobilising these latest
protests against the CAA and NRC, there is the government’s capacity to
haul up internet providers and shut them down. In 2018 0ver 70 percent of
all internet shutdowns in the world among democracies was carried out by
the Indian government which through its continuing internet lockdown in
Kashmir Valley holds the world record for such continuity of internet
blackout. After the latest protests began the government has again resorted
to shutting down internet in select areas and in UP on a much wider and
prolonged basis.

The RS applauds the remarkable struggle of the students and ordinary
citizens across religious divides to overturn the CAA and prevent the NRC
from taking place. Given the recent history of how the Supreme Court (SC)
has behaved one cannot rely on it to strike down this Act or rule against
the NRC.

The RS commits itself to the long term struggle against this fascistic
force. The RS seeks to work with all those who have an uncompromising and
principled opposition against Hindutva and its politics, economics and
ideology.

December 25, 2019
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/greenyouth/CACEsOZgR6JuUA7fwgb1UkNo9UJ0wt%2Bn50QEFLKH9gCAT%3DOQbbg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to