[Before getting into the details of how the investigations were planfully
undermined, it lists out four reasons to do so.

It'd be well to keep in mind that the princely states in British India -
for very understandable reason, were little affected by the gigantic
freedom movement - sweeping the length and breadth of the rest of the land,
and would, post-Independence, emerge, by and large, as bastions of
reactions.
These are the areas where the BJS (and the Swatantra Party) would have
major support bases.

<<Third, with the assassination happening so soon after the massacres
during Partition, Sardar Patel and Morarji Desai wanted to avoid communal
violence. According to Govind Ballabh Pant and Lal Bahadur Shastri, Patel
and Morarji feared uncontrollable communal violence if Savarkar was
arrested. Sardar Patel reportedly said at a Congress meeting, ‘The Muslims
are already against us. If Savarkar is arrested/convicted, then the Hindus
too will turn against us.’ This apprehension is talked of both by Larry
Collins and Dominique Lapierre in Freedom at Midnight and Tushar Gandhi in
Let’s Kill Gandhi.>>]

https://theprint.in/opinion/was-sardar-patel-soft-on-savarkar-in-gandhi-murder-case/594973/

Gwalior to Godse — Was Sardar Patel soft on Savarkar in Gandhi murder case,
and if so, why
My mother was part of the prosecution team in the Gandhi murder trial. She
pointed out several loopholes that were allowed to remain so.

RAVI VISVESVARAYA SHARADA PRASAD

30 January, 2021 1:57 pm IST

The trial of persons accused of participation and complicity in Gandhi's
assassination in the Special Court in Red Fort Delhi on May 27, 1948 |
Wikimedia Commons

The setting up of the Godse Gyan Shala in Gwalior by the Akhil Bharatiya
Hindu Mahasabha to propagate the ideologies of Nathuram Godse is an
appropriate occasion to re-evaluate the involvement of the Hindu Mahasabha,
and especially its Gwalior branch, in the assassination of Mohandas
Karamchand Gandhi.

The Italian Beretta revolver that Nathuram Godse used to assassinate Gandhi
originally belonged to Colonel V.V. Joshi, military secretary to the
Maharaja of Gwalior, Jiwajirao Scindia. How it reached a gun trader was
never investigated properly. Of the five people who conveyed the revolver
to Nathuram and Narayan Apte, the biggest weapons dealer in Gwalior,
Jagadish Prasad Goyal, was not named in the chargesheet at all.

The leader of the chain, Dattatreya Sadashiv Parchure, head of the Hindu
Mahasabha in Gwalior, and physician to the Scindia royal family, was
sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court of Justice Atma Charan,
but was acquitted on technicalities later. The three other persons, who
were senior leaders of the Hindu Mahasabha in Gwalior, were listed as
untraceable.

My late mother Kamalamma Madikera Sharada Prasad was part of the
prosecution team in the Gandhi murder trial. She also worked in the Bombay
government. Oscar Henry Brown, chief presidency magistrate of Mumbai, had
specifically recruited her to get evidence from one of the accused —
Shankar Kistayya, who worked for Digambar Ramachandra Badge.

Badge, a weapons dealer and a Hindu Mahasabha member, had turned approver.

As I have pointed out in other articles, my mother, and other junior
members of the prosecution team, suspected that the case against the Hindu
Mahasabha and Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was being deliberately weakened
under directions from deputy prime minister and home minister Sardar
Vallabhbhai Patel, and Morarji Desai, then home minister of Bombay. No
matter what they personally said.

My personal assessment, based on my discussions with my mother and others
such as D.G. Tendulkar and Robert Payne, is that there were numerous
strategic and national interest considerations for Sardar Patel to ensure
that the investigation did not probe the involvement of the Hindu Mahasabha
too closely.


The proceedings of the murder trial were published by the government of
India. The Justice Jeevan Lal Kapur Commission report was also published in
full. This article has drawn from these sources.

Also read: Godse, raised as a girl, saw Gandhi as an ‘effeminate’ Father
who didn’t protect Mother India

Pieces of the puzzle
First, according to my mother, Sardar Patel found the Hindu Mahasabha’s
activities with Hindus strategically useful against the Nizam of Hyderabad,
who had allowed Muslim Razakars to butcher Hindus. The role of the
Mahasabha in Hyderabad is mentioned by both S.R. Date in Bhanagar Struggle
and A.G. Noorani in Savarkar and Hindutva. Mahasabha branches in Pune,
Ahmednagar, and Gwalior were said to be helping Hindus in the Nizam of
Hyderabad’s territories. My mother worked in the Bombay government in close
coordination with Jamshed Nagarvala who headed the CID. Nagarvala was close
to Morarji Desai.

Two of the biggest weapons dealers were Badge in Pune, and Jagadish Prasad
Goyal in Gwalior, who was instrumental in transporting the Beretta revolver
to Nathuram Godse from the Maharaja of Gwalior’s army officer.

Second, the integration of the princely state of Gwalior into the Indian
Union was then at a very delicate stage.

Sardar Chandrojirao Angre, the powerful and popular uncle of Maharaja
Jiwajirao Scindia, had established the Hindu Mahasabha in Gwalior. It was
headed for long by Dr Dattatreya Sadashiv Parchure, who was close to both
the royal family and Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.

The Hindu Mahasabha enjoyed strong support in Gwalior, and was expected to
form the government after Independence, with Parchure becoming the premier.
However, the Dewan of Gwalior, M.A. Sreenivasan, who was close to
Jawaharlal Nehru, swore in Congress ministers instead. Narayan Apte and
Parchure threatened Sreenivasan that they would “finish him and Gandhi
off”. Sreenivasan wrote about this in his autobiography Of the Raj,
Maharajas, and Me.

Third, with the assassination happening so soon after the massacres during
Partition, Sardar Patel and Morarji Desai wanted to avoid communal
violence. According to Govind Ballabh Pant and Lal Bahadur Shastri, Patel
and Morarji feared uncontrollable communal violence if Savarkar was
arrested. Sardar Patel reportedly said at a Congress meeting, ‘The Muslims
are already against us. If Savarkar is arrested/convicted, then the Hindus
too will turn against us.’ This apprehension is talked of both by Larry
Collins and Dominique Lapierre in Freedom at Midnight and Tushar Gandhi in
Let’s Kill Gandhi.

Fourth, my assessment, based on Sardar Patel’s papers [The Collected Works
of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, by P.N. Chopra], is that he was shrewdly
trying to split the hardline elements of the Hindu Mahasabha and the RSS
away from their more moderate members, and then get the moderates to join
the Congress party.

Also read: In his second term, Modi govt has moved from Deen Dayal
Upadhyaya to Veer Savarkar

‘Are you mad?’
My mother described to me numerous lacunae in the investigation of the
unsuccessful attempt on Gandhi’s life on 20 January 1948. The assassination
of 30 January could have possibly been prevented too.

Madanlal Pahwa was a Partition refugee from west Punjab. His family had
been massacred, and he was looking for revenge. Pahwa was employed by
Professor Jagadish Chandra Jain of Ruia College to sell his books. Jain
writes that during one of Pahwa’s tirades against Muslims, Pahwa said he
and his friends wanted to kill Gandhi. Pahwa also mentioned that Vishnu
Karkare, Hindu Mahasabha head in Ahmednagar, took him to meet Savarkar, who
had shown his approval. Jain dismissed this as the bragging of a young
traumatised man.

On 20 January 1948, Pahwa placed a bomb (gun-cotton slab) at Birla Sadan in
an attempt to kill Gandhi.

During his interrogation, according to the case diary, Pahwa first claimed
that he acted alone. However, on 22 January, Pahwa named Karkare, but said
that he did not know the others. He said some of them were associated with
the Pune newspaper Hindu Rashtriya and had stayed at the Hindu Mahasabha
Bhawan.

On 21 January 1948, professor Jain read in the newspapers that his employee
Pahwa had exploded a bomb. Jain immediately called Sardar Patel, but
couldn’t get through (Patel was leaving Delhi for Ahmedabad and did not
have time to speak to Jain, but the latter left a message). Jain then went
to Balasaheb Gangadhar Kher, the premier of Bombay province, who directed
him to go to Morarji Desai. Jain was cut off after a few minutes by
Morarji, who also accused him of being part of Pahwa’s ploy. However, that
night, Morarji told Jamshed Dorab Nagarvala, the deputy commissioner of
police of Bombay, what he had heard about Pahwa.

Jain wrote about this in three of his books —  I Could Not Save Bapu,
Murder of Mahatma Gandhi and The Forgotten Mahatma.

As I have written in my Open article, Nagarvala told my mother that he had
immediately asked Morarji for permission to arrest Savarkar. Morarji
angrily denied it, saying: “Are you mad? Do you think I want this whole
province to go up in smoke?” However, Nagarvala managed to obtain Morarji’s
reluctant consent to place Savarkar under surveillance. Morarji had also
rushed to Ahmedabad to meet Sardar Patel after talking to Nagarvala.

In the trial court, Morarji was questioned by Savarkar’s lawyers as to why
he had placed Savarkar under surveillance two days after Pahwa exploded the
bomb.

Morarji replied: “Shall I give the full facts? I am prepared to answer. It
is for him [Savarkar] to decide.”

Savarkar signalled to his lawyers to withdraw this question. Lawyer A.G.
Noorani, too, has written about this episode.

Could Morarji’s reply have revealed something about the Hindu Mahasabha’s
role in Hyderabad? Multiple sources make it clear that Morarji was in the
know about Sardar Patel’s Hyderabad strategy.

Justice Atma Charan, at first, refused permission to have this question
withdrawn, remarking that it was central to the prosecution’s case against
Savarkar. Only after elaborate arguments by both Savarkar’s lawyers as well
as by the prosecution team was this question expunged from the official
record. My mother told me this.

No wonder Nagarvala did not arrest Nathuram and Gopal Godse, Apte, Karkare,
and Badge at the time, though he was quite capable.

In reply to a question by Balakrishna Sharma in the Constituent Assembly,
Sardar Patel stated that arresting them would have alerted the principal
conspirators to escape.

Acquittals in the way
The Godse brothers, Apte, and Karkare then met at Thane on the night of 26
January 1948 where they planned the second attack on Gandhi.

The chargesheet mentions that on 27 January, Nathuram and Apte flew to
Delhi, from where they took a train to Gwalior, and stayed overnight with
Parchure. Parchure refused to give his personal weapon to them. However,
Parchure’s aide, Gangadhar Dandavate, said that he would obtain a suitable
revolver. Enter Colonel Joshi’s revolver.

The 9 mm M1934 model Beretta revolver originally belonged to a senior
Italian army officer in Ethiopia during World War II. The Fourth Gwalior
Infantry regiment, led by Colonel Joshi, captured this Italian commander in
Ethiopia, who ceremonially surrendered his weapons to Colonel Joshi. After
the war, Colonel Joshi became military secretary to the Maharaja of Gwalior.

The persons who brought this revolver from Colonel Joshi and sold it to
Nathuram Godse for Rs 300 included arms dealer J.P. Goyal, and three senior
leaders of the Hindu Mahasabha — Gangadhar Dandavate, Gangadhar Jadhav, and
Surya Deo Sharma. Tushar Gandhi’s book Let’s Kill Gandhi and the
chargesheet both mention this.

However, according to my mother, Goyal was crucial to Sardar Patel’s
strategy against Nizam’s Hyderabad, and Colonel Joshi was never even named
in the chargesheet filed in the trial court.

Dandavate, Jadhav, and Sharma were listed as untraceable in the
chargesheet. They were expected to become cabinet ministers if a Mahasabha
government had been sworn in with Parchure as the premier, according to the
intelligence my mother had.

Parchure was questioned on 3 February, and formally arrested on 18 February
1948. The same day, he gave his statement before the magistrate of Gwalior,
R.B. Atal, confessing to supplying the Beretta pistol to Nathuram and Apte.
The trial court sentenced Parchure to life imprisonment. However, on
appeal, the Punjab High Court acquitted him because he was a British
citizen, and proper procedures had not been followed to extradite him from
Gwalior to Delhi. The Punjab High Court also held that the provisions of
the Indian Penal Code did not apply in the princely state of Gwalior.

Nagarvala also interrogated Savarkar’s bodyguard, Appa Ramachandra Kasar,
and secretary, Gajanan Vishnu Damle. They confirmed, as many have noted,
that the two Godse brothers, Apte, and Karkare had long meetings with
Savarkar on 14, 17, and 24 (after the blast) January 1948. Later, it was
said their confessions were extracted under torture.

The prosecution team, led by Advocate General Chander Kishan Daphthary, did
not summon Savarkar’s secretary and bodyguard. The Justice Jeevan Lal Kapur
Commission castigated this lapse, remarking that the evidence against
Savarkar would have been complete if these two had been summoned to give
their statements.

Also read: Don’t hang Godse, said Gandhi’s sons. This is how Nehru, Patel
and Rajaji replied

Stickler for truth
My mother, a psychology graduate, had developed a good rapport with Badge
and Karkare, and had won their confidence, while they played badminton
together in the evenings at Red Fort.

Vishnu Karkare, head of the Hindu Mahasabha in Ahmednagar, was an absolute
stickler for truth. He just could not tolerate anyone lying, even if it was
to save their own lives.

While being questioned by the judge, Savarkar denied having met any of the
conspirators since 1946, citing poor health. Karkare whispered to my mother
that Savarkar was lying, saying he had met Savarkar numerous times, as did
Nathuram and Gopal Godse, Apte, and Parchure.

More importantly, Karkare let slip to my mother while they were playing
badminton that Badge’s statement on Savarkar saying “Gandhi, Nehru, and
Suhrawardy should be finished” was absolutely true.

My mother told this to the lawyers in the prosecution team, but it was not
presented as formal evidence.

After Savarkar’s death in February 1966, the Justice Jeevan Lal Kapur
Commission examined fresh evidence from Nagarvala and concluded: “All these
facts taken together were destructive of any theory other than the
conspiracy to murder by Savarkar and his group.”

Also read: Sardar Patel was adamant, give Kashmir to Pakistan, take
Hyderabad. Nehru saved it: Soz

A princely plan
Going through Sardar Patel’s papers (Collected Works of Sardar Vallabhbhai
Patel by P.N. Chopra, volumes 13 and 14) gives me the impression that he
was very careful to distinguish the extremist Hindu Rashtra Dal from its
parent organisation, the Hindu Mahasabha. My conclusion is that once the
Mahasabha had served its purposes in Hyderabad and other princely states,
Sardar Patel intended to weaken its top leadership and get its foot
soldiers to join the Congress party.

My assessment is that while Sardar Patel was personally certain that V.D.
Savarkar had ordered the assassination of Gandhi, he wanted to ensure
Savarkar was given the benefit of doubt.

Sardar Patel wrote to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on 27 February 1948:
 “… All the main accused have given long and detailed statements of their
activities…It clearly emerges from these statements that the RSS was not
involved in it at all. It was a fanatical wing of the Hindu Mahasabha
directly under Savarkar that hatched the conspiracy and saw it through …Of
course, his assassination was welcomed by those of the RSS and the
Mahasabha who were strongly opposed to his way of thinking and to his
policy. But beyond this, I do not think it is possible, on the evidence
which has come before us, to implicate any other members of the RSS or the
Hindu Mahasabha….”

There were whispers in the prosecution team that Nehru wanted Maharaja
Jiwajirao Scindia to be investigated.

However, Sardar Patel strongly suspected another president of the Hindu
Mahasabha, Narayan Bhaskar Khare, who was then premier of Alwar, of being
involved in the assassination of Gandhi. This has been written about by
many including Hari Desai in Asian Voice, Indira Mohal in Khare versus
Nehru, and Kannan Srinivasan in Wire.

Sardar Patel and Khare had a tortuous association. In 1937, Khare became
the Congress premier of Central Provinces and Berar. In 1938, Sardar Patel
dismissed Khare as premier and expelled him from the Congress party. He
then joined the Hindu Mahasabha.

At the time of Partition, Khare informed Sardar Patel about the overtures
made by Pakistan to numerous Rajput kingdoms, where Muslims comprised over
25 per cent of the population. V.P. Menon’s book Story of Integration of
Indian States describes this in detail, as does Khare’s own autobiography
My Political Memoirs. But things soon went south when Khare allegedly
ordered massacres in Alwar and Bharatpur.

On 7 February 1948, Sardar Patel dismissed Khare as premier of Alwar, and
had him placed under house arrest together with Raja Jai Singh of Alwar.
Suspicion of Khare’s involvement in Gandhi’s murder as well as charges of
inciting communal violence had led to this. However, detailed interrogation
of both of them by the police found that they were ignorant of all the
attempts to assassinate Gandhi. They were never mentioned in the
chargesheet.

Several junior members of the prosecution and Nagarvala’s team speculated
that the Khare probe could have been a feint to draw them away from
investigating the leads in Pune, Ahmednagar, and Gwalior. Khare was
detained several days before Gopal Godse and Narayan Apte were arrested by
Nagarvala.

In my assessment, Sardar Patel’s Hindu Mahasabha strategy appears to have
been successful. He also used the opprobrium over Gandhi’s assassination to
quickly install Congress administrations in the Hindu Mahasabha strongholds
of Indore, Dewas, and Dhar, and incorporate them, together with Gwalior,
into what became the state of Madhya Pradesh.

Ravi V.S. Prasad is a technology consultant and defence analyst. His
mother, Kamalamma Madikera Sharada Prasad, was a freedom fighter and later
an official interpreter during the Gandhi murder trial. His father, H.Y.
Sharada Prasad, was a journalist, civil servant and adviser to three Indian
prime ministers — Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi and Morarji Desai. Views are
personal.
-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/greenyouth/CACEsOZisDith35m9jDGEL8xnwKfrb7DyR75xqLxe6qFLiTxSnQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to