Tracy wrote: Can I ask: is it only the vertical placement of the dot that's > wrong (i.e. is the simple replacement you mention correct), or should > the following notes be shifted horizontally as well?
Hi. I think that it is only the vertical placement of the dot. Thanks for the intention to address this bug. For users sake, success! Regards. Miguel. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Tracy Llenos <[email protected]> wrote: > Miguel V. S. Frasson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I have posed recently a question in gregorio-users list. See > > > > https://mail.gna.org/public/gregorio-users/2012-02/msg00016.html > > > > I discovered the answer, editing the tex file. The dot is placed below > > if we replace > > \grepunctummora{d}{0}{0}{0} > > by > > \grepunctummora{d}{0}{1}{0} > > > > But this is probably a bug in gregorio, because the punctum mora in > > prin(efe)cí(d')pi(c)um.(d.efD'Cd) > > looks quite odd and the output file should contain the dot below in this > > case, like in others were it applies. > > > > Please, if you consider this a real bug, say so and I can file a bug > report > > if necessary. > > > Hi, > > Thanks for reporting this; it is indeed a bug. I'll try to fix it > soon. Can I ask: is it only the vertical placement of the dot that's > wrong (i.e. is the simple replacement you mention correct), or should > the following notes be shifted horizontally as well? > > Thanks again for catching this, > > -Tracy > -- Miguel Vinicius Santini Frasson [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
