I am trying to understand the point of G_PES_ORISCUS_QUADRATUM. The only way this pseudo-glyph can appear is if the capital-O is used and salicus (egOi) is not detected. However, I don't see how it plays into much. (gOi) produces the same thing as (goi), which is a pes quassus. (hgOi) produces the same thing as (hgoi), a punctum followed by a pes quassus. It seems like the only difference is for a figure (gOe) versus (goe), and (gOe) can actually be replicated with (go/e).
The reason I'm studying this is for the stemmed oriscus. I believe I can use capital-O for it. If I do that, (gOi) will produce the stemmed oriscus and (goi) unstemmed. In my analysis (which I'm currently assuming is wrong), the only figure lost would be how (gOe) currently differs from (goe), but which would still be achievable by (go/e). Further, (!), (/), (//), and ( ) can differentiate a salicus from a punctum followed by a stemmed oriscus [i.e., (egOi) vs (e!gOi)] Any thoughts? Henry _______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
