On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 05:33:01 pm +0200, Élie Roux wrote: > Le 19/06/2015 17:27, Br. Samuel Springuel a écrit : > > Given the number of changes in 4.0, I think a beta is in order. > > > > Timeline wise, I'll comment on just the issue I'm involved with. > > Since the remaining phase of the TeX renaming deals with internal > > functions, there will be no need for CHANGELOG entries or version > > number changes when incorporating them. As a result, I would be okay > > with starting the release cycle for 4.0 before finishing those > > changes. > > I think there are still too much work in progress to have a beta now... > maybe alpha would be more relevant. The biggest remaining issue is #59, > I don't think it can be addressed in just a few days...
With issue #59 done and #393 postponed, if pull requests #527 (for issue #508, a 4.0-related bug) and #527 (for issue #396) are approved, the only remaining issue for 4.0 is #383, discussed above. Are there any further impediments to a 4.0 beta besides Br. Samuel's availability to build for Windows and MacOS? Henry _______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
