Am 02.03.21 um 21:32 schrieb Artur Tarassow:
Am 02.03.21 um 17:46 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, atecon wrote:
Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
I can't think of an easier way of doing this, and your function
seems to
me a good candidate for "extra". One possible modification would be:
function matrix unstack(series x, series names[null], \
strings S[null])
where the caller needs to supply one of @names or @S, allowing
for the
possibility that there's no handy series holding group names and you
therefore want to submit an array of group names directly. Or,
drop the
@S argument but be ready to construct automatic names (e.g.
"unit%d") in
case @names is not given.
Jack, would you take care of pushing this into 'extra', or is further
discussion needed?
Please, what's the status here?
Hi,
I asked Jack to think about the possibility to make this a (I think)
natural extension of my user-contributed "stack_data" package. But
no reply, yet ;-)
Uhm, I think I'd rather have it inside "extra"; but I don't have a
strong opinion on this, really.
I started to add it to stack_data. Let me show you the prototype
tomorrow or so, Jack. Then you can decide ;-)
Hi Jack,
here is the implementation of unstack():
https://github.com/atecon/stack_data/blob/master/src/stack_data.inp
Things are also tested:
https://github.com/atecon/stack_data/blob/126b04104f412bed4e2cfb8c8c72474899c05434/tests/run_tests.inp#L342
Artur
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it
Website:
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/
