These are the "acceptance" test I got from Allin, some years ago:
https://github.com/HelioGuilherme66/gretl/tree/gretl-tests/gretl-tests/test-gretl


On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:25 PM Sven Schreiber <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de>
wrote:

> Am 08.05.2024 um 23:08 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 3:58 PM Sven Schreiber<sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> 
> <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Agreed, this needs to be fixed in the package. However, from the
> timeline of the release of gretl 2024a on April 5th, it would mean that
> the package should have failed already in the run-up to the release. My
> question then is, why didn't we notice? I thought it's a standard part
> of the testing parcours to check the sample scripts of all packages.
>
> You're right. I'm afraid there was a testing failure in this case. All
> the gfns had been tested probably a day before the March 29 change,
> and at the time it didn't seem that anything "significant" had changed
> between then and the April 5 release. But that's a risky assumption,
> and not one I'll make in future. Obviously, it would be good if I were
> not the only person testing all the gfns' sample scripts in the run-up
> to a release.
>
> Yes, we should better distribute those tasks.
>
> thanks
>
> sven
> _______________________________________________
> Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it
> To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it
> Website:
> https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/
>
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it
Website: 
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/

Reply via email to