These are the "acceptance" test I got from Allin, some years ago: https://github.com/HelioGuilherme66/gretl/tree/gretl-tests/gretl-tests/test-gretl
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:25 PM Sven Schreiber <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Am 08.05.2024 um 23:08 schrieb Cottrell, Allin: > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 3:58 PM Sven Schreiber<sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> > <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Agreed, this needs to be fixed in the package. However, from the > timeline of the release of gretl 2024a on April 5th, it would mean that > the package should have failed already in the run-up to the release. My > question then is, why didn't we notice? I thought it's a standard part > of the testing parcours to check the sample scripts of all packages. > > You're right. I'm afraid there was a testing failure in this case. All > the gfns had been tested probably a day before the March 29 change, > and at the time it didn't seem that anything "significant" had changed > between then and the April 5 release. But that's a risky assumption, > and not one I'll make in future. Obviously, it would be good if I were > not the only person testing all the gfns' sample scripts in the run-up > to a release. > > Yes, we should better distribute those tasks. > > thanks > > sven > _______________________________________________ > Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it > To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it > Website: > https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/ >
_______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it Website: https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/