On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:22 PM Sven Schreiber <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > is the "no_const" specification for the ui-maker apparatus for a > function package GUI really working as intended? I seem to have a case > where I have a ui-maker function that requests no_const for a list > argument X, but I can execute the function with X = const alright. BTW, > X is set to have a "null" default, if that matters. Or does no_const > really mean that any constant term is removed quietly? > > I don't have time to give a minimal example right now, but I could do so > on Friday or so, if necessary.
Please do. This may be redundant, but of course the "no_const" specification only applies to GUI usage. Allin _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it Website: https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/
