On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:45 PM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Am 30.07.2024 um 14:14 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:34 AM Sven Schreiber
> > <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> >> Am 28.07.2024 um 14:33 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> >>> Am 28.07.2024 um 02:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
> >>>> Ah, your ui-maker specifications for list arguments are out-of-date.
> >>>> The possibilities are: list_no_singleton, list_no_const and
> >>>> list_exclude. IIRC it was you who requested the "list_" prefix for
> >>>> these conditions ;-). See the current function-package doc.
> >>> ...
> >>> So that means we have to adjust the (few) packages that use the old
> >>> style? For example, StrucTiSM does, and maybe some others, too.
> >> Is this no_singleton vs. list_no_singleton thing visible in the XML code
> >> in the gfn file?
> > Yes, you just have to look at the ui-maker function.
>
> OK, I checked all the function packages, and apart from the mentioned
> StrucTiSM the constructs without list_ are used in ParMA and in
> random_forest.
>
> However: I also read the package doc more thoroughly, and it says there:
> "These keywords can also be given in a shorter form, omitting the list_
> prefix, ". That would then bring me back to the original question why it
> didn't seem to work in the example I gave? (I haven't tested yet whether
> it would work with the list_ prefix.)

Good point, and good question. I'll take another look at this.

Allin
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it
Website: 
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/

Reply via email to