On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:45 PM Sven Schreiber <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Am 30.07.2024 um 14:14 schrieb Cottrell, Allin: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:34 AM Sven Schreiber > > <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> Am 28.07.2024 um 14:33 schrieb Sven Schreiber: > >>> Am 28.07.2024 um 02:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > >>>> Ah, your ui-maker specifications for list arguments are out-of-date. > >>>> The possibilities are: list_no_singleton, list_no_const and > >>>> list_exclude. IIRC it was you who requested the "list_" prefix for > >>>> these conditions ;-). See the current function-package doc. > >>> ... > >>> So that means we have to adjust the (few) packages that use the old > >>> style? For example, StrucTiSM does, and maybe some others, too. > >> Is this no_singleton vs. list_no_singleton thing visible in the XML code > >> in the gfn file? > > Yes, you just have to look at the ui-maker function. > > OK, I checked all the function packages, and apart from the mentioned > StrucTiSM the constructs without list_ are used in ParMA and in > random_forest. > > However: I also read the package doc more thoroughly, and it says there: > "These keywords can also be given in a shorter form, omitting the list_ > prefix, ". That would then bring me back to the original question why it > didn't seem to work in the example I gave? (I haven't tested yet whether > it would work with the list_ prefix.)
Good point, and good question. I'll take another look at this. Allin _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it Website: https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/