On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:12 AM Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
<p002...@staff.univpm.it> wrote:
>
> I just had an email exchange with one of the authors, and we have their
> blessing in publishing the dataset with the empty series removed
> (they're working to fill them up with new data, so they won't be dropped
> in future releases).
>
> I just created a subdir called dataset/AWMD into our private SF
> workspace repo with all the necessary files to automate the creation of
> the gdt file as much as possible.
>
> I propose to add this dataset to our collection of sample datasets,
> possibly moving older versions out of the way.
>
> The original authors have agreed to send us new versions of the dataset
> when they release them. We then convert it to the gretl format and
> schedule it for inclusion in the next release. Of course, this will mean
> that each new gretl version will contain the latest version of the AWMD
> available at release time. I believe this shouldn't be a problem, we
> already do this with the St. Louis FED database. In the meantime, we
> send the authors a copy in gdt format so they can make it available on
> their website.
>
> Is this ok for everyone?

This all sounds good, Jack!

Allin
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it
Website: 
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/

Reply via email to