On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:12 AM Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti <p002...@staff.univpm.it> wrote: > > I just had an email exchange with one of the authors, and we have their > blessing in publishing the dataset with the empty series removed > (they're working to fill them up with new data, so they won't be dropped > in future releases). > > I just created a subdir called dataset/AWMD into our private SF > workspace repo with all the necessary files to automate the creation of > the gdt file as much as possible. > > I propose to add this dataset to our collection of sample datasets, > possibly moving older versions out of the way. > > The original authors have agreed to send us new versions of the dataset > when they release them. We then convert it to the gretl format and > schedule it for inclusion in the next release. Of course, this will mean > that each new gretl version will contain the latest version of the AWMD > available at release time. I believe this shouldn't be a problem, we > already do this with the St. Louis FED database. In the meantime, we > send the authors a copy in gdt format so they can make it available on > their website. > > Is this ok for everyone?
This all sounds good, Jack! Allin _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it Website: https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/