On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 9:34 AM Sven Schreiber <sven.schrei...@fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Am 28.07.2025 um 14:23 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > > > > There's one case that provokes a "missing data" error. That's with > > "add", when one or more of the candidate series for addition include > > missing values within the original estimation range that are not > > aligned with missing values in the dependent variable or the original > > regressors. We refuse that case since it would force a reduction of > > the sample relative to the original estimation. A simple example follows. > > That sounds like the right thing to do. BTW, I also think that the > original sample range should be maintained with "omit" even if the > variable responsible for the sample restriction were dropped. I believe > this is already the case (right?), but maybe we should also have a test > case for that. I can make one up if you want.
Yes, that's right: we preserve the original sample, even when omitting a regressor with missing values would permit a bigger sample. Allin _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-le...@gretlml.univpm.it Website: https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/
