Allin,

Thanks for the clarifications. One thing though -- if I change the data 
structure to stacked cross sections, the data get re-organized as expected. But 
if I then say it's stacked cross sections a second time, the second 
re-organization doesn't restore the original stacked time series. 

Here's a sample of the data:
1) original (correct) stacked time series:
      Argentina     14244.71
      Argentina     12275.32
      Argentina     11118.07
      Argentina     13661.23
      Argentina     14503.41
      Argentina     15670.38
      Australia     22988.74
      Australia     24901.34
      Australia     26079.21
      Australia     29283.26
      Australia     33732.40
      Australia     38077.99
        Austria     23277.40
        Austria     24792.66
        Austria     28504.44
        Austria     30264.96
        Austria     34459.28
        Austria     36360.78

2) after applying stacked cross-sections:
      Argentina     14244.71
       Colombia      8057.55
         Greece     19121.09
Korea, Republic     18670.63
       Pakistan      2273.91
      Sri Lanka      4455.84
      Argentina     12275.32
       Colombia      7888.27
         Greece     18317.34
Korea, Republic     20788.10
       Pakistan      2673.16
      Sri Lanka      5290.79
      Argentina     11118.07
       Colombia      8416.99
         Greece     18804.01
Korea, Republic     24389.44
       Pakistan      3102.81
      Sri Lanka      6081.70
      Argentina     13661.23

3) after 2nd application of stacked cross-sections:
      Argentina     14244.71
         Malawi      1255.76
        Belgium     22800.87
         Mexico     12464.08
   Burkina Faso      1218.20
      Nicaragua      2595.55
       Colombia      8057.55
       Paraguay      6163.80
        Denmark     33573.49
         Rwanda      1351.55
    El Salvador      6470.20
   South Africa      9856.35
         Greece     19121.09
          Syria      2878.26
      Indonesia      3094.67
         Turkey      7561.41
        Jamaica      9418.74
      Venezuela     13117.04
Korea, Republic     18670.63

PS

-----Original Message-----
From: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu 
[mailto:gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu] On Behalf Of Allin Cottrell
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:19 PM
To: Gretl list
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] changing panel data structure

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Summers, Peter wrote:

> While helping a student sort out a dynamic panel estimation, I
> discovered the following. If I take a data set that's organized
> as stacked time series, change the structure to stacked
> cross-sections, then change it back, the second change isn't
> implemented. I get a box saying no changes were made. Is this
> intended behavior?

Ah, maybe it's a bit confusing but in fact it is intended. The
main point is that a panel dataset _must_ be organized as stacked
time series for use in gretl. "Stacked cross sections" is not an
option for panel data in gretl, it's just a way of saying that
your data are currently the wrong way round and need to be fixed.

So, if you go to "/Data/Dataset structure" and say that your
dataset is stacked cross sections, gretl will reorganize it for
you as stacked time series (a "physical" reorganization of the
data). Note that if you then go back to the "Dataset structure"
dialog your data will initially appear as "Stacked time series",
so, naturally, stating that the structure is stacked time series
will produce no change.

If you want to change the actual data layout back to what it was
originally, you have to say that it's stacked cross sections
(again), and gretl will reorganize the data in the opposite
direction.

Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users

Reply via email to