Am 12.11.2013 17:55, schrieb Pindar:
>
>           loop for j=1..order --quiet
>
>> aha, gotcha -- the official syntax is w/o "for"
> ;-)
>
> I prefer to use the 'for variant'.
>

It may stop working at some point, however. (Not me who decides this.)
-s

Reply via email to