Actually, my first attempt at resolving the error was to try "modeltab print --output=filename." Something like that does seem more logical to me as a long-term fix.
PS Sent from my iPad > On Jan 6, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote: > >> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Summers, Peter wrote: >> >> According to the 'modeltab' help (and previous forum postings), the >> following should work: >> <hansl> >> (estimate various models & add them to model table) >> modeltab show >> modeltab --output="outputfile.tex" >> </hansl> >> >> However, the second line generates the error "Command has >> insufficient arguments." > > Thanks for the report. This was fall-out (hopefully about the last!) > from the "new tokenizer", in which the modeltab caommand was marked as > requiring a parameter (not just an option). But as you say, the doc > indicates that you don't need a parameter in conjunction with the > --output option (other than the filename parameter to the option). > > It seems the tokenizer has exposed a mild anomaly here: it might be > more consistent to require, e.g., > > modeltab print --output=whatever > > However, for now I've just re-enabled the original, advertised syntax. > That's in CVS and snapshots. > > Allin > > _______________________________________________ > Gretl-users mailing list > Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu > http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
