Yah - I much prefer seperation of function, myself. I like a hardline OO and n-tier approach to my architecture :)
Tyler On Oct 2, 8:15 am, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It does make it more complicated in some ways. I find it easier though > when returning error messages because it is all localized to a single > page and I can just set a variable and then write it. Plus I can more > easily rebuild my form. Of course again this is all Classic ASP which > is not the most advanced of programming languages so it may be easier > to do that in something like .NET or PHP. Also, I think it is easier > for people after me to be able to open one page and make changes to > just one page as opposed to having to open two or more pages and > changing each of those just to change a field name or something. > > Different folks, different strokes. > > On Oct 2, 10:53 am, Logos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oooo, complicated...but if it fits your coding style, all good. Me, I > > always try to keep mine as simple as I can so I don't get bit. Which > > happens too often as it is! :P > > > Tyler > > > On Oct 1, 11:13 am, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hey Dave, > > > > I actually do this on a site that I am working on. > > > > To do it is probably quite weird and silly. But on my form I set a > > > QueryString ( sorry asp developer, the stuff after the ?) that just > > > says submit=3Dy. Then I check for that. When I find it I do my form > > > processing and then write some simple script code that tells the top > > > to hide the gb using top.top.gb_hide(); (as Logos talked about in > > > another post) I suppose as well though you could just do > > > top.top.reload and it will take care of it. I actually have mine > > > redirect to another page. I then tell the asp script to stop any other > > > responses so the page loads and does it's script thing. > > > > On Sep 30, 1:50 pm, "Dave Tuepah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Works for me! > > > > > Thanks for the tip! > > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Logos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I don't know any way to submit a form to itself in a greybox and then > > > > > have that same page load in the parent. I am not sure it is even > > > > > possible. While you may prefer to code that way, I would advise > > > > > against it in this instance as it would cause far more heartache and > > > > > grief than just submitting to a second page. > > > > > > Tyler > > > > > > On Sep 29, 9:25 am, "Dave Tuepah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > And what if I'm submitting it to the same page? I tend not to > > > > > > write a > > > > > form > > > > > > submission page, but rather just submit the form to itself if you > > > > > follow... > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Logos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi overkil! It is easy to do what you are asking. Whatever page > > > > > > > you're submitting the form to in the greybox, add a body onload > > > > > > > function to reload the top page. This will of course close the > > > > > > > greybox with no extra coding required. > > > > > > > > (eg) <body onload=' top.location.reload(true);'> > > > > > > > > Tyler > > > > > > > > On Sep 28, 6:40 pm, overkil6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > > I am testing GreyBox to see if it will suit my needs. I am > > > > > > > > using it > > > > > > > > for basic form submission. How would I close a GreyBox and > > > > > > > > refresh > > > > > > > > the parent on the form submission - is it possible? > > > > > > > > > Cheers! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GreyBox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greybox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
