* Klaus Fuerstberger [Mon Jul 18, 2016 at 09:41:01AM +0200]: > as I could not post a blog comment at > http://blog.grml.org/archives/394-Is-Grml-still-alive.html I want to > leave a comment to this article here.
> Many thanks for grml all over the years. Please keep on providing new > releases without systemd packages. There is no need for this bloated > piece of software for a text based distribution for system admins. > Maybe you can base grml on devuan, a systemd-free, debian-based > distribution in the future? https://devuan.org/ I am sure that you will > get help there if there are any questions. JFTR, we definitely plan to ship Grml *with* systemd, because that is the way to go for us and also gives people remastering Grml even more flexibility WRT service startups, independent from our default configuration. If you're interested in a Grml flavor *without* systemd you're invited to work on that, you might be also interested in picking up file-rc as upstream respectively package maintainer (file-rc being the init system we relied on so far and where no maintainer seems to be present anymore, esp. once both Alex and me will orphan it). regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grml mailing list - [email protected] http://ml.grml.org/mailman/listinfo/grml join #grml on irc.freenode.org grml-devel-blog: http://blog.grml.org/
