* Michael Prokop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060830 17:14]: > * Jan-Pieter Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20060828 17:15]: This is more or less the problem: > > Now if I configure eth1 with the netcardconfig, networking doesn't > > work any longer. So the eth0 link (configured by dhcp works, but when eth1 (static, configured with netcardconfig) comes up , eth0 stops working. This Isn't what it is supposed to do I think.
> But maybe I can find a solution for your problem for netcardconfig > anyway. The problem has already been solved by commenting out the 'network' and 'broadcast' line. > What do you exactly expect from netcardconfig? You want to > be able to get something like: > > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.9.253 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > broadcast 192.168.0.255 > nameserver 195.58.160.194 > > instead of: > > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.9.253 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 192.168.9.0 > broadcast 192.168.0.255 > gateway 192.168.9.1 > nameserver 195.58.160.194 > > ? Exactly, i think this solves the problem (I've suspect the gateway thing to 'steal' the acces to eth0) > > BTW i've written a little script to enable routing with iptables, if > > you want it, drop me a note. > > If it might be useful for grml - for sure, just mail it to me. > It's on its way! JP -- I use grml (http://grml.org/) _______________________________________________ Grml mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.mur.at/mailman/listinfo/grml join #grml on irc.freenode.org grml-devel-blog: http://grml.supersized.org/
