Thanks for the info. I crossed my fingers and had a working GRML CD to hand and did the udev upgrade, not a problem there.
Michael Whapples On -10/01/37 20:59, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Michael Whapples<[email protected]> [20091024 12:41]: > > > >> I have been intending to ask this for sometime but never quite got round >> to it. >> > > >> On my GRML HD installation when I have been upgrading packages I keep >> getting a conflict involving udev. It seems to be that libgudev >> (probably is something to do with the gnome packages I have installed) >> depends on libudev0>= 146 but GRML provides libudev0 0.141-1grml.04. >> This raises a few questions: >> > > >> * Would it be safe for me to upgrade to the Debian version of udev, I >> have held off as udev is quite core to the system and I don't want to >> really mess up my system. >> > > Shouldn't cause any problems on harddisk installations. > Though having a *working* grml CD/USB-pen available is always a good > idea. ;) > > > >> * Why does there seem to be a difference in the Debian package numbering >> and the GRML numbering (GRML seems to be providing 0.XXX where as Debian >> seems to have XXX, surely the versions don't differ as much as this >> suggests). >> > > There's no big change, it's just that the numbering scheme changed > in Debian lately. It used to be something like 0.141-1 for Debian > and 0.141-1grml.03 for the grml package, though as soon as we rebase > to Debian's 146-6 it will become something like 146-6grml.01 as well > then. > > > >> * Would it be possible for GRML to provide a suitable updated udev >> package to match the Debian one? >> > > Post grml 2009.10 sure, though we are holding udev back for a number > of reasons for the current stable release. > > > regards, > -mika- > _______________________________________________ Grml mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.mur.at/mailman/listinfo/grml join #grml on irc.freenode.org grml-devel-blog: http://grml.supersized.org/
