gbranden pushed a commit to branch master in repository groff. commit 12b1651b090367e77571f593fe19a5d7188c2dd7 Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> AuthorDate: Mon Jun 23 01:03:29 2025 -0500
[troff]: Revise diagnostic messages. * src/roff/troff/input.cpp (composite_glyph_name) (charinfo_to_node_list): Reform terminology in diagnostic messages. Use the term "character" when dealing with input; it's up to the output driver to elicit "glyphs" from a device. (charinfo_to_node_list): Refer to "special", not "composite", characters, when processing a user-defined character with a string iterator. Illustration of the former: $ printf '.char \\[foo] \\[foo]\n\\[foo bar]\n' | ./build/test-groff -a troff: backtrace: '<standard input>':2 troff: backtrace: file '<standard input>':2 troff:<standard input>:2: error: invalid base character 'foo' in composite character name <beginning of page> The latter caused a confusing backtrace. Before: $ printf '.char \\[foo] \\[foo]\n\\[foo]\n' | groff -a <beginning of page> troff: backtrace: '<standard input>':1: composite character 'foo' troff: backtrace: '<standard input>':2 troff: backtrace: file '<standard input>':2 troff:<standard input>:2: warning: special character 'foo' not defined After: $ printf '.char \\[foo] \\[foo]\n\\[foo]\n' | ./build/test-groff -a <beginning of page> troff: backtrace: '<standard input>':1: special character 'foo' troff: backtrace: '<standard input>':2 troff: backtrace: file '<standard input>':2 troff:<standard input>:2: warning: special character 'foo' not defined --- ChangeLog | 10 ++++++++++ src/roff/troff/input.cpp | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index d03a9879c..38b635254 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +2025-06-23 G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> + + * src/roff/troff/input.cpp (composite_glyph_name) + (charinfo_to_node_list): Reform terminology in diagnostic + messages. Use the term "character" when dealing with input; + it's up to the output driver to elicit "glyphs" from a device. + (charinfo_to_node_list): Refer to "special", not "composite", + characters, when processing a user-defined character with a + string iterator. + 2025-06-22 G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> * doc/groff.texi.in (Strings) <length>: diff --git a/src/roff/troff/input.cpp b/src/roff/troff/input.cpp index 28fd5fe92..7d7ff16e8 100644 --- a/src/roff/troff/input.cpp +++ b/src/roff/troff/input.cpp @@ -4402,7 +4402,8 @@ static symbol composite_glyph_name(symbol nm) if (0 /* nullptr */ == gn) { gn = valid_unicode_code_sequence(nc); if (0 /* nullptr */ == gn) { - error("invalid base glyph '%1' in composite glyph name", nc); + error("invalid base character '%1' in composite character name", + nc); return EMPTY_SYMBOL; } } @@ -9692,7 +9693,7 @@ node *charinfo_to_node_list(charinfo *ci, const environment *envp) token old_tok = tok; input_stack::add_boundary(); string_iterator *si = - new string_iterator(*mac, "composite character", ci->nm); + new string_iterator(*mac, "special character", ci->nm); input_stack::push(si); // we don't use process_input_stack, because we don't want to recognise // requests _______________________________________________ groff-commit mailing list groff-commit@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff-commit