gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.

commit 7d2fef66a8db1ce81894ce8230693d9c87a815bb
Author: G. Branden Robinson <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Wed Mar 11 18:31:37 2026 -0500

    HACKING: Revise material on copyright notices.
    
    * Clarify guidance on adding files.
    * Drop phrase copied from a commit log.  "This notice" has no referent
      in the observed context.
---
 HACKING | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
index 4442612fc..24f3fd0a1 100644
--- a/HACKING
+++ b/HACKING
@@ -282,9 +282,9 @@ What To Do
   is "legally significant" per the 15-line threshold.  But even a new
   file of legally significant size does not merit a copyright notice if
   it does not constitute original, non-robotic expression as discussed
-  above.  Include "Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes" in the Git commit
-  log message.  To summarize, the same rules apply to new files as to
-  changes to existing ones.
+  above.  In that case, include "Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes" in the
+  Git commit log message.  To summarize, the same rules apply to new
+  files as to changes to existing ones.
 
 * In UTF-8-encoded files, it is fine to use a true copyright sign
   (Unicode U+00A9).  Place it in the notice between the word "Copyright"
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ What To Do
   unavailable.  Nowadays, its advice is that "c" (note lowercase) is an
   "acceptable variant", that _may_ retain the efficacy of the copyright
   notice.  The word "copyright", spelled out in full, also suffices per
-  that resource, and is already present in this notice.
+  that resource.
 
   See <https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ03.pdf>.
 

_______________________________________________
groff-commit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff-commit

Reply via email to