gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.
commit a5acc4824c961c386537342f1ca3049bae6c40c9
Author: G. Branden Robinson <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri May 8 21:28:07 2026 -0500
doc/groff.texi.in: Correct and clarify.
* Fix an overbroad statement in a footnote; `\R` has no impact on an
environment.
* Refer simply to "Solaris troff", not "Solaris 10 troff", since Solaris
11 retains its DWB 2.0/System V-descended formatter--just not for
formatting man pages.
---
doc/groff.texi.in | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/groff.texi.in b/doc/groff.texi.in
index c6004ea2d..9596bb06c 100644
--- a/doc/groff.texi.in
+++ b/doc/groff.texi.in
@@ -21725,7 +21725,11 @@ the formatter does not tokenize the escape sequences
@code{\s},
and
@code{\S},
-but instead updates the environment.}
+but instead updates
+its global register dictionary
+(@code{\R}),
+or the environment
+(all others).}
the smallest meaningful unit of
@command{troff} @c generic
input.
@@ -23333,8 +23337,8 @@ set
in bold;
DWB,
Plan@tie{}9,
-and Solaris@tie{}10
-@command{troff}s @c DWB, Plan 9, Solaris 10
+and Solaris
+@command{troff}s @c DWB, Plan 9, Solaris
set it in roman.
The only way to determine if a font selection operation succeeded
in the latter group of formatters
_______________________________________________
groff-commit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff-commit
