gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.
commit 47b7ce29dc1cf60418c51b62ca8bfde0408087cd
Author: G. Branden Robinson <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sat Jun 6 21:43:39 2026 -0500
doc/groff.texi.in: Clarify.
Speak specifically of the formatter program where relevant.
Break input lines in convenient places for roffing and diffing.
---
doc/groff.texi.in | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/groff.texi.in b/doc/groff.texi.in
index 07a5e38b0..80b20f07a 100644
--- a/doc/groff.texi.in
+++ b/doc/groff.texi.in
@@ -13787,13 +13787,27 @@ accent}). @code{u0045_0302_0301} is thus the glyph
name for U+1EBE,
@sc{latin capital letter e with circumflex and acute}.
@item
-groff maintains a table to decompose all algorithmically derived glyph
-names that are composites itself. For example, @code{u0100} (@sc{latin
-letter a with macron}) is automatically decomposed into
-@code{u0041_0304}. Additionally, a glyph name of the GGL is preferred
-to an algorithmically derived glyph name; @code{groff} also
-automatically does the mapping. Example: The glyph @code{u0045_0302} is
-mapped to @code{^E}.
+GNU
+@command{troff}
+maintains a table
+to decompose all algorithmically derived glyph names
+that are composites.
+For example,
+@code{u0100}
+(@sc{latin letter a with macron})
+is automatically decomposed into
+@code{u0041_0304}.
+Additionally,
+a glyph name of the GGL is preferred
+to an algorithmically derived glyph name;
+GNU
+@command{troff}
+also automatically does the mapping.
+Example:@:
+The glyph
+@code{u0045_0302}
+is mapped to
+@code{^E}.
@item
glyph names of the GGL can't be used in composite glyph names; for
_______________________________________________
groff-commit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff-commit
