> The `groff' .TS and .TE could be such that the text goes around a
> table in a nice way.  Maybe you could use your redefinitions in the
> original definitions.

It would be much better to fix the floating environment of -ms, so
that the following works:

  .KF
  .TS
  nokeep;
  ...
  .TE
  .KE

Any volunteers to implement that?  It should be rather simple, namely
to set a flag in .KF (or .KS) which is tested in .TS to avoid a new
diversion.  Maybe it can be even implemented without tbl's `nokeep'
option...


    Werner


_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff

Reply via email to