> Considering UTF and Unicode in general, > there is a problem of Normalization. > I.e. it would be nice to have UTF transformed to composed form > before feeding to groff, since the likelihood of a precomposed > glyph being in the font is higher then the chance of groff > typesetting base glyph + combining glyph properly.
You are completely right. I'll archive your comment :-) For the moment, I'll ignore it. It's a step too early -- it should be rather straightforward to generate this from the Unicode tables (simimilar to the opposite). Werner _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
