> > Well, Big5 should probably be used too, together with EUC-KR.
>
> Big5 is not a good candidate to support here, because there are many
> variants of Big5 and none of it is formally standardized. [...]
I know that too well, but the ETen variant is still the most favourite
encoding in Taiwan (besides Unicode).
> If you want to support an encoding for traditional Chinese, it
> should be CP950;
Hmm...
> EUC-KR is not needed: Korean users migrated to Unicode quite early,
> several years ago, because EUC-KR is missing about half of the
> characters needed for proper support of Korean.
Well, supporting EUC-KR doesn't harm, and it completes the round of
`old' CJK encodings.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
