> > > -//{ "\\-", "2212" },
> > > + { "\\-", "2212" },
> >
> > This change doesn't make sense. It's not possible to use a
> > backslash within \[...]. Consequently, glyph names which start
> > with a backslash can't be used as composites.
>
> The patch part 14 uses the glyph_name_to_unicode() function at a
> different place, namely for any glyphs, not only composed
> ones. Patch part 13 was meant as a preparation for part 14.
Ah, ok. I missed that. Patch applied.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
