> Hmm, with the current CVS I get the result below which looks > plausible to me. You should get the same with 1.19.2, I think.
Indeed - I spent the afternoon debugging this (how lame is that?) and found that 1.19.2 works just fine. Nice work on the an-old.tmac (whoever did that). I backported an-old.tmac to work with groff 1.11 and also shoved in my .SA request (is that something you want?). I needed the backport because I didn't want to upgrade all of our machines to groff 1.19 (it was pretty easy - get rid of all .nop, .return and s/de1/de/ - did I miss anything?). BTW - groff is certainly coming along nicely, it's been a while since I've lived in macro packages and you've added some nifty features. Thanks. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
