> > I asked this some 6 weeks ago but got no answers. hoping that the mail
> > maybe reaches some other list members this time I dare to repeat my
> > question:
I haven't forgotten your email, but I wasn't able to immediately
response, and it moved deeper and deeper into my cueue of unanswered
emails (which contains 350 emails, unfortunately). It's always a good
thing to send a reminder!
> > refer:./test:4: nothing to reference (probably `bibliography' before
> > `sort')
> >
> > this occurs if the document `test' contains the directive
> > .R1
> > accumulate
> > .R2
> > but does _not_ include references.
>
> As I recall, this warning was implemented because, in a previous
> release, placing the bibliography command before any other commands
> caused a segmentation fault. The behavior was fixed: no segfault,
> but when these commands are out of order, no output is produced,
> which was presumably not the intended result - hence the warning.
Exactly. Please provide a small example document which exhibits the
annoying behaviour you observe. Maybe I can implement a fix.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
