Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The second instance of "Dr\(:oge" displays correctly, but the > > "\fBDr\(:oge\fR" instance does not (depending on which X shell I try > > it in, it either displays a replacement character, blank space, or > > some other character). > > > > Is this a known issue? Any way to work around it? > > I can't repeat that. Saving the above snippet as `test.man' and > adding `.TH' as the very first line, the command > > groff -Tutf8 -man test.man > > works just fine, emitting correct UTF8 at the console.
Thanks for checking it. I had been testing on a Debian machine but just now tried it on a Fedora one. It works as expected there. I guess it's probably just another bug introduced by one of the Debian patches to groff. Next time I'll try to remember to test somewhere other than just on Debian before reporting problems --Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Groff mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
