> > I see. Well, `preconv -e ...' will be replaced with `soelim -e ...',
> > so this isn't a real problem.
>
> OK. I think a link will still be needed,
Hmm, I quite dislike a hard link.
> because simply checking whether preconv exists on $PATH is a lot
> easier for man to do than trying to check whether soelim accepts the
> -e option.
Why? Using an invalid option with soelim guarantees a non-zero error
code.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
