Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This should be rather
>
> + printfs("(u;\\n[%1]+(\\n[%2]/\\n[%3]))",
> [...]
>
> shouldn't it?
Arrggh. Yes, that's just about the kind of simple troff error
I was expecting I had made...
I'll test tonight. Interface question: do you want this to become the
new default behavior, or contingent on an existing switch like 'expand',
or contingent on a new switch?
I favor making it the new default, myself. I'm thinking of Mike Smith
and his stylesheets.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
