> I've hit a wall on the block column allocation thing. I'm pretty
> sure my C++ for counting block-containing columns is correct and
> that the general theory of the emitted troff is sound (Werner
> thought so too when I described it). I've checked in logic that
> will enable anyone to try out the new rule under the global flag
> 'experimental'.
There were typos which I hopefully have fixed now.
> But it doesn't work. It leads to block columns widths that are too
> large. The problem almost has to be in the troff generated by one
> of these two lines:
Again, it's too late today for continuing. I suggest to do the
following:
tbl TEST > TEST.tbl
groff -man -mtrace TEST.tbl > TEST.ps 2> TEST.log
for better tracing.
Werner
