On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip] > What do you think about enabling this bizarre behaviour of `em' only > in compatibility mode? As already mentioned, I can't think of any > useful application. This would save us from introducing the proposed > `em1' request. It makes sense to me. Clearly, most of us weren't even aware of the behavior so I see nothing wrong with relegating it to compatibility mode. jcs
