On Tuesday 04 August 2009 16:17:35 brian m. carlson wrote: > > BTW, pdfroff is designed to work in conjunction with > > pdfmark.tmac; omitting that seems rather unusual. > > Okay. I read the list, so I was aware that it was intended to > make using the pdfmark package easier; however, I assumed that it > would process regular (non-pdfmark) files as well.
It will, but its multipass processing, (required to resolve pdfmark references), is an expensive overhead for documents which don't require it. > Perhaps a mention in the man page about this might help avoid > unrealistic expectations. Patches -- including documentation patches -- are always welcome. -- Regards, Keith.
