Hi, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote on Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:21:01PM +0200: > Ralph Corderoy wrote: >> G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>>> Any tips? >> Here's a simpler test case. > "IP" is a temporary indent. "RS" indents not relative to the indent > of "IP", but relative to the indent of a corresponding "PP" > (and by default indents the same amount). That said, .RS/.RE can be nested, while .TP, .IP, and .HP cannot, which can be understood because the latter do not have explicit closing macros. If they could nest, how would you ever get out of the indented item body again? Note that in contrast to man(7), mdoc(7) does not have such a restriction. The .Bl macro freely nests, except that .Bl -column cannot contain inner lists. If you are forced to remain with man(7), it may be an option to use .RS/.RE for the outer level, similar to this: top level text .TP non-nesting tag body for the non-nesting tag .PP outer tag .RS outer body .TP inner tag inner body .PP back to outer body .RE back to top level Yes, i do admit that is ugly, but man(7) is almost never elegant and definitely never semantic but always purely presentational. At least the above is pure man(7) without resorting to low-level roff requests like .in, and it works as you want, IIUC. Yours, Ingo
