On 6/5/21, G. Branden Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that's a good idea but I think I'd prefer to document it in > troff(1) instead of groff(1).
Makes sense to me.
On 6/5/21, G. Branden Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that's a good idea but I think I'd prefer to document it in > troff(1) instead of groff(1).
Makes sense to me.