Hi Branden and Damian,
I am not subscribed to the list, so please keep my address in the To
header when responding. It saves my time and ensures my email client
can retain threading metadata effortlessly.
Sorry for forgetting to mention this when posting.
On Tue Mar 3, 2026 at 3:05 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2026-03-03T03:02:40+0100, onf wrote:
> > In neatroff, \N takes the glyph name as defined by the font rather
> > than its numeric ID (e.g. \N'radicalbt') which makes using \N for
> > this portable across all fonts with the same naming scheme
>
> Isn't that what `\C'radicalbt'` is for? With the same qualification?
As far as I know, \C'anything' is equivalent to \[anything]. At least
groff(7) says so:
\C'glyph'
As \[glyph], but compatible with other troff implementations.
That is how neatroff implements \C, too.
Cheers,
onf