Hi Alexis, At 2026-03-15T12:57:42+0100, Alexis (surryhill) wrote: > I'm happy to report that yes, exporting GROFF_BIN_PATH=. into the > nixpkgs test environment works for me and makes the neqn-smoke-test > pass.
I'm delighted to hear it! I'm usually nervous about recommending remedies I haven't checked myself--it's a good way to get egg on one's face, and mine already resembles an omelet with many ingredients. ;-) > If you think there is value in "enhancing" groff's test suite, I'm all > for it, if not, your response has provided me with a very acceptable > solution for the groff nixpkgs :) I'd like to figure out a superior approach for the next "big" release (planned for early July), but I don't think a spurious test failure in a _relatively_ exotic environment like NixOS (or similar) by itself warrants, say, a 1.24.2 release. That said, containerized, FHS-disregarding, and other initiatives related to build reproducibility are becoming less exotic by the day. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
