Dear Gromacs users,

Sorry if you are receiving this email twice!

I am trying to study a self-assembly process of a polymer with three different 
composition ratio using Gromacs in CPU cluster (Intel(R) Xeon(R)). As the ratio 
of the polymer constituents are different, the number of atoms differs in each 
case (# of atoms ~ 170000,  190000, and 217000). Each system contains 40 chains 
of each polymer and N number of water molecules.

Due to constant failure and blowing up of the systems in NPT equilibration and 
further production run using Parrinello-Rahman pressure coupling I thought of 
using Berendsen for the last 2 systems. Using Berendsen pressure coupling there 
is no failure until now (4ns). However the performance has become very poor. 
Using 16 MPI processes and 8 OpenMP threads per MPI process the last 2 systems 
are achieving only 0.4-0.6ns/day.

On the other hand the first one can achieve nearly 4ns/day.  The differences in 
.mdp file of system 1 from the other two are that during nvt and npt I have 
used cutoff-scheme   = Verlet and in NPT and for  further production run the 
pressure coupling as Parrinello-Rahman. I have attached all the .mdp files 
here. The scheme I have used are:  1) Position restr NVT 2) position restr NPT 
3) free NPT 4) production run. I agree that systems 2nd and 3rd would 
definitely take more time than the 1st one due to the difference of no. of 
atoms but should not this much. I am in doubt now whether I have messed up with 
my mdp files to get rid of the blowup from NPT simulations.

I would be highly grateful if you could look into the files and help me find 
out the problems so that I can get the performance back. Please let me know if 
I need to provide more information.


Thanks in advance.
Mousumi
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to