Thanks a lot, Justin

It really makes me feel weird. The small triple helix with 30 amino acids per 
chain(generated simply by deleting other atoms in .pdb file of the real triple 
helix) can be equilibrated for 1ns using exactly the same control files, and 
the real triple helix can be used for full atomic simulation without any 
problem. The CG topology is generated using the same mitinize.py downloaded 
from the website. I will try for another time, and will tell you if I fix it.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se 
[mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of Justin 
Lemkul
Sent: Sunday, 17 May 2015 7:07 AM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] energy minimization problem



On 5/16/15 8:30 AM, Ming Tang wrote:
> Dear Justin,
>
> I tried to use small time step. First,  set dt=0.005ps, after running 20ps, I 
> found one chain of the triple helix just went to another water box totally. I 
> guess there is something wrong with the martini ff because of the small time 
> step.
> Then, I increased it to 0.01ps, after running 40ps, I checked the .gro, and 
> found all the three chains stay together, which is reasonable. However, even 
> use dt=0.01, the simulation can only run about 1ns. And, after simulating 100 
> ps using dt=0.01ps, the simulation can just run thousands of steps when dt is 
> increased to 0.02ps. I tried many times and many different time steps, but 
> still could not see the possibility for it to run hundreds of  nanoseconds, 
> which is quite normal when using martini force. If the system can be further 
> minimized, then it can run longer maybe.
>

This seems entirely random and suggests instead that there is something simply 
physically unstable with the system or problematic in the topology.  I don't 
use MARTINI (or CG models in general) so there's little else I can suggest.  
Maybe someone more experienced with such systems will chime in.

Also note that a chain "moving into another box" is probably just a PBC effect 
and not a true dissociation.  If it is a dissociation, it's not simply because 
of the time step.

-Justin

--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==================================================
--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
-- 
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a 
mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.

Reply via email to