On 7/16/15 12:47 AM, sridhar dwadasi wrote:
Thank you for the response. In case of an all atom representation, the connections are different. What about a united atom representation? The g_x2top supports Gromacs 53a5 forcefield right?
If you write an .n2t file for it, sure.
Can we get a topology with x2top only for an all atom representation? Or is there anyway to get it for gromos or opls ua ?
No, it works with any force field for which an .n2t file exists. -Justin -- ================================================== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences School of Pharmacy Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629 University of Maryland, Baltimore 20 Penn St. Baltimore, MD 21201 jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul ================================================== -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
